Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12676674›Full record

ArticleApplied and environmental microbiology2003

Evolutionary engineering of Saccharomyces cerevisiae for anaerobic growth on xylose.

Marco Sonderegger, Uwe Sauer

Open access · greenAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed
9.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed, 247 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. FromJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  2. Engineering ofEngineering microbiology · 2023
    Review
  3. Recent advances in the microbial production of squalene.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2022
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Cell Aggregation and Aerobic Respiration Are Important forApplied and environmental microbiology · 2019
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Biotechnology for biofuels · 2017
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Xylose Fermentation by Saccharomyces cerevisiae: Challenges and Prospects.International journal of molecular sciences · 2016
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Marco SondereggerInstitute of Biotechnology, ETH Zürich, Switzerland.
Uwe Sauer
ETH Zurich · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Xylose utilization is of commercial interest for efficient conversion of abundant plant material to ethanol. Perhaps the most important ethanol-producing organism, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, however, is incapable of xylose utilization. While S. cerevisiae strains have been metabolically engineered to utilize xylose, none of the recombinant strains or any other naturally occurring yeast has been able to grow anaerobically on xylose. Starting with the recombinant S. cerevisiae strain TMB3001 that overexpresses the xylose utilization pathway from Pichia stipitis, in this study we developed a selection procedure for the evolution of strains that are capable of anaerobic growth on xylose alone. Selection was successful only when organisms were first selected for efficient aerobic growth on xylose alone and then slowly adapted to microaerobic conditions and finally anaerobic conditions, which indicated that multiple mutations were necessary. After a total of 460 generations or 266 days of selection, the culture reproduced stably under anaerobic conditions on xylose and consisted primarily of two subpopulations with distinct phenotypes. Clones in the larger subpopulation grew anaerobically on xylose and utilized both xylose and glucose simultaneously in batch culture, but they exhibited impaired growth on glucose. Surprisingly, clones in the smaller subpopulation were incapable of anaerobic growth on xylose. However, as a consequence of their improved xylose catabolism, these clones produced up to 19% more ethanol than the parental TMB3001 strain produced under process-like conditions from a mixture of glucose and xylose.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularAldehyde ReductaseAnaerobiosisCulture MediaD-Xylulose ReductaseGenetic EngineeringPhosphotransferases (Alcohol Group Acceptor)PichiaRecombination, GeneticSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSugar Alcohol DehydrogenasesXyloseAldehyde ReductaseCulture MediaD-Xylulose ReductasePhosphotransferases (Alcohol Group Acceptor)Sugar Alcohol DehydrogenasesXylosexylulokinase

Identifiers

PMID12676674
PMCPMC154834
OpenAlexW2115470699

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.