Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12676145›Full record

ArticleNeuroscience2003

The effects of nicotinic and muscarinic receptor activation on patch-clamped cells in the optic tectum of Rana pipiens.

C-J Yu, E A Debski

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuroscience, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 46% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Electrophysiological properties of isthmic neurons in frogs revealed by in vitro and in vivo studies.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2010
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

C-J YuDepartment of Biological Sciences, 101 T. H. Morgan Building, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40506-0225, USA.
E A Debski
University of Kentucky · US

Funding

CHOLINERGIC MODULATION OF THE VISUAL SYSTEMR01EY011913 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI DEBSKI, ELIZABETH A · 1997 to 2000
$91k
NEI NIH HHS EY11913NEI NIH HHS R01 EY011913
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Both nicotinic and muscarinic cholinergic receptors are present in the optic tectum. To begin to understand how the activation of these receptors affects visual activity patterns, we have determined the types of physiological responses induced by their activation. Using tectal brain slices from the leopard frog, we found that application of nicotine (100 microM) evoked long-lasting responses in 60% of patch-clamped tectal cells. Thirty percent of these responses consisted of an increase in spontaneous postsynaptic currents (sPSCs) and had both a glutamatergic and GABAergic component as determined by the use of 6-cyano-7-nitroquinoxaline-2,3-dione (50 microM) and bicuculline (25 microM), respectively. Remaining response types consisted of an inward membrane current (16%) and an increase in sPSCs combined with an inward membrane current (14%). All responses could be elicited in the presence of tetrodotoxin (0.5 microM). Muscarinic receptor-mediated responses, induced by carbachol (100 microM) application after nicotinic receptor desensitization, produced responses in 70% of tectal cells. In contrast to responses elicited by nicotine, carbachol-induced responses could be evoked multiple times without significant decrement. Responses consisted of either an outward current (57%), a decrease in sPSCs (5%) or an increase in sPSCs, with (almost 6%) or without (almost 3%) an outward current. The response elicited by carbachol was not predicted by the response of the cell to nicotine. Our results suggest that nicotinic receptors are found predominantly at presynaptic locations in the optic tectum while muscarinic receptors are most often present at postsynaptic sites. We conclude that both of these receptor types could substantially modulate visual activity by changing either the input to tectal neurons or the level of their response to that input.

Indexed as

AcetylcholineAnimalsExcitatory Amino Acid AntagonistsExcitatory Postsynaptic PotentialsGABA Antagonistsgamma-Aminobutyric AcidGlutamic AcidMuscarinic AgonistsNeural InhibitionNicotinic AgonistsPatch-Clamp TechniquesPresynaptic TerminalsRana pipiensReceptors, MuscarinicReceptors, NicotinicSuperior ColliculiAcetylcholineExcitatory Amino Acid AntagonistsGABA Antagonistsgamma-Aminobutyric AcidGlutamic AcidMuscarinic AgonistsNicotinic AgonistsReceptors, MuscarinicReceptors, Nicotinic

Identifiers

PMID12676145
PMCPMC2265077
OpenAlexW2136337939

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.