Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12673464›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2003

Pan-European multicentre economic evaluation of recombinant urate oxidase (rasburicase) in prevention and treatment of hyperuricaemia and tumour lysis syndrome in haematological cancer patients.

L Annemans, K Moeremans, M Lamotte, J Garcia Conde, H van den Berg, H Myint, R Pieters, A Uyttebroeck

Abstract readEvaluation StudyMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 77 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Tumour lysis syndrome.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2024
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

L AnnemansHEDM (Health Economics and Disease Management), Brusselsesteenweg 91, 1860, Meise, Belgium. lieven.annemans@hedm.be
K Moeremans
M Lamotte
J Garcia Conde
H van den Berg
H Myint
R Pieters
A Uyttebroeck
Emma Kinderziekenhuis · NLErasmus MC - Sophia Children’s Hospital · NLGhent University · BERoyal Bournemouth Hospital · GBUniversitair Ziekenhuis Leuven · BEUniversitat de València · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

goalsHyperuricaemia (HU) and tumour lysis syndrome (TLS) are complications of acute myeloid/lymphoid leukaemia (AML/ALL) and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) leading to increased morbidity and mortality. The objective was to assess incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER) of preventing/treating HU and TLS with recombinant urate oxidase, rasburicase (Fasturtec/Elitek). PATIENTS AND

methodsIncidence and costs of HU and TLS were based on a multi-country chart review. Life expectancy at the time of diagnosis was based on published survival rates and age at diagnosis. Reductions of HU/TLS following treatment with rasburicase were based on clinical trial data.

resultsPrevention with rasburicase appears highly cost-effective in children (ICER between Eur 425 and Eur 3054 per life-year saved, LYS). In adults, prevention is more cost-effective in NHL and ALL (maximum ICER of Eur 41383 and Eur 32126 per LYS). Treatment of established HU/TLS with rasburicase is cost-saving in children and highly cost-effective in adults. The results are robust in children. In adults, the prevention strategy appears sensitive to the risk of HU/TLS.

conclusionsIn conclusion, rasburicase, in addition to the demonstrated clinical benefit, is an economically attractive new option in the treatment of HU, both in adults and children. In prevention the drug has an attractive economic profile in children, and is cost-effective in adults with ALL and NHL.

Indexed as

AdultChildChild, PreschoolCost-Benefit AnalysisCost of IllnessDrug CostsEuropeHematologic NeoplasmsHumansHyperuricemiaIncidenceLeukemiaLymphoma, Non-HodgkinMiddle AgedOutcome and Process Assessment, Health CarePrognosisrasburicaseUrate Oxidase

Identifiers

PMID12673464
OpenAlexW1544475963

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.