Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12671756›Full record

ArticleTAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik2003

Nearly complete genetic maps of Pinus sylvestris L. (Scots pine) constructed by AFLP marker analysis in a full-sib family.

T-M Yin, X-R Wang, B Andersson, E Lerceteau-Köhler

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Large-scale heterospecific segregation distortion in Populus revealed by a dense genetic map.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2004
    Article
  10. A full saturated linkage map of Picea abies including AFLP, SSR, ESTP, 5S rDNA and morphological markers.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2004
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

T-M YinDepartment of Forest Genetics and Plant Physiology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, S-901 83 Umeå, Sweden.
X-R Wang
B Andersson
E Lerceteau-Köhler

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We have constructed nearly complete linkage maps of Pinus sylvestris (L.) using AFLP markers based on a two-way pseudo-testcross strategy in a full-sib family founded in an advanced breeding program. With 39 primer combinations, a total of 737 markers (320 from the mother and 417 from the father) segregated in a 1:1 ratio, corresponding to DNA polymorphism: heterozygous in one parent and null in the other. In the maternal parent, 188 framework markers were mapped in 12 linkage groups, equivalent to the Pinus haploid chromosome number, with a total coverage of 1,695.5 cM. In the paternal parent, 245 framework markers established a map with 15 linkage groups, spanning a genome length of 1,718.5 cM. The estimated total map length was L(F) = 1,681 cM for the female and L(M) = 1,645 cM for the male using a modified method-of-moment estimator. Combining these values with those estimated from the observed map lengths in both parents, we estimated the genome length in Scots pine to be between 1,600 and 2,100 cM. Our genome coverage was estimated to be more than 98% with a framework marker interval of 20 cM for both parents. Most of the female and male linkage groups were associated through the analysis of the intercross markers.

Indexed as

Chromosome MappingChromosome SegregationGenetic MarkersGenome, PlantPinus sylvestrisSequence Analysis, DNAGenetic Markers

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.