Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12668705›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Royal Society of Medicine2003

The doctor-patient relationship in US primary care.

Pam Lings, Philip Evans, David Seamark, Clare Seamark, Kieran Sweeney, Michael Dixon, Denis Pereira Gray

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. The patient-doctor relationship: a synthesis of the qualitative literature on patients' perspectives.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2009
    Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. CHECKLIST USE FOR ASSESSMENT OF SATISFACTION WITH TRANS-TIBIAL PROSTHESES.Journal of rehabilitation medicine. Clinical communications · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Doctor-patient communication in Southeast Asia: a different culture?Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice · 2013
    Article
  14. Article
  15. General practice in the new world.Clinical medicine (London, England) · 2011
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Psychosocial and psychodynamic factors influencing health care utilisation.Health care analysis : HCA : journal of health philosophy and policy · 2006
    Review
  18. Article
  19. What's important in the doctor-patient relationship?Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine · 2003
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Pam LingsInstitute of General Practice (now the Peninsula Medical School), School of Sport and Health Sciences, University of Exeter, Barrack Road, UK. pam.lings@pms.ac.uk
Philip Evans
David Seamark
Clare Seamark
Kieran Sweeney
Michael Dixon
Denis Pereira Gray

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Changes in the organization of primary care in the UK are driven by a need to improve access and availability, but doctor-patient relationships may suffer. To investigate the importance of such relationships in a different setting, we analysed focus-group data obtained in a primary care facility in the USA (Rochester, NY). The findings pointed to three key factors in these relationships-namely, an asymmetry of perceptions on the two sides, belying the notion of a meeting of experts; the importance on both sides of 'liking'; and the value set by both parties on development of trust. The last two of these factors are probably related to continuity of care, now under threat.

Indexed as

Physician-Patient RelationsContinuity of Patient CareEmpathyFemaleFocus GroupsHealth Services AccessibilityHealth Services ResearchHumansMaleNew YorkPrimary Health CareTrustEmpirical ApproachProfessional Patient Relationship

Identifiers

PMID12668705
PMCPMC539446

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.