Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12667430›Full record

ReviewCurrent atherosclerosis reports2003

Applied gene therapy in preclinical models of vascular injury.

Stefan P Janssens

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current atherosclerosis reports, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Stefan P JanssensCardiac Unit and Center for Transgene Technology and Gene Therapy, Campus Gasthuisberg, 49 Herestraat, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium. stefan.janssens@med.kuleuven.ac.be

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Atherosclerosis remains the major cause of morbidity and mortality in Western countries. Atherothrombotic complications, including vascular occlusions and severe narrowing of nutrient blood vessels in the cerebral, coronary, or peripheral circulation, usually require invasive revascularization strategies. As molecular mediators contributing to these complications are being identified in more representative experimental injury models, and as gene transfer platforms and vectors acquire improved safety and efficacy profiles, there is ground for cautious optimism that gene-based interventions will likely reduce the clinical burden of these diseases. Increased generation of reactive oxygen species in diseased atherosclerotic vessels has been implicated in vasospasm, exaggerated neointima formation, and enhanced thrombosis. Ex vivo pressurized vascular gene transfer in venous bypass grafts using antisense oligonucleotides directed against cell-cycle control genes can modify the venous graft's phenotype and confer clinical benefit with improved long-term graft survival. Alternatively, percutaneous intra-arterial gene transfer is feasible, but at relatively low transgene expression levels. Although this may suffice in the case of secreted gene products with marked paracrine or bystander effects, including nitric oxide synthase and heme oxygenase-1, drug- and gene-eluting stents may provide the preferred future vehicle for well-controlled, quantifiable, and safe vascular gene transfer. Continued efforts to improve gene transfer technology in diseased human vessels and to increase our understanding of molecular targets are required before the full therapeutic potential of vascular gene therapy can be realized.

Indexed as

Blood Vessel ProsthesisDisease Models, AnimalGenetic TherapyGene Transfer TechniquesProsthesis FailureAnimalsArteriesHumansMiceRabbitsRatsSwineVascular Diseases

Identifiers

PMID12667430
OpenAlexW2016878288

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.