Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12666725›Full record

ReviewThe Korean journal of parasitology2003

Review of Neospora caninum and neosporosis in animals.

J P Dubey, John Dubey

Erratum issuedOpen access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Korean journal of parasitology, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 189 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
189citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
28.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

189 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 822 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. The Global Prevalence ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2022
    Pooled it
  5. Seroprevalence ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022
    Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. TheMicroorganisms · 2026
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Seropositivity and Risk Factors forAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Nationwide herd-level seroprevalence ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2026
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Serological detection ofOpen veterinary journal · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Seroprevalence ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article

129 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
    Dubey, John P [corrected to Dubey, J P]
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

J P DubeyUnited States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Animal and Natural Resources Institute, Beltsville Agricultural Research Center, Building 1001, Beltsville, Maryland, 20705-2350, USA. jdubey@anri.barc.usda.gov
John Dubey
United States Department of Agriculture · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neospora caninum is a coccidian parasite of animals. It is a major pathogen for cattle and dogs and it occasionally causes clinical infections in horses, goats, sheep, and deer. Domestic dogs are the only known definitive hosts for N. caninum. It is one of the most efficiently transmitted parasite of cattle and up to 90% of cattle in some herds are infected. Transplacental transmission is considered the major route of transmission of N. caninum in cattle. Neospora caninum is a major cause of abortion in cattle in many countries. To elicit protective immunity against abortion in cows that already harbor a latent infection is a major problem. This paper reviews information on biology, diagnosis, epidemiology and control of neosporosis in animals.

Indexed as

AnimalsBuffaloesCoccidiosisDisease Models, AnimalDogsFemaleGoatsHorsesHumansNeosporaPregnancyPrevalenceSheep

Identifiers

PMID12666725
PMCPMC2717477
OpenAlexW1994958449

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.