Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12665987›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of applied physiology2003

Hemodynamics during active and passive recovery from a single bout of supramaximal exercise.

Antonio Crisafulli, Valentina Orrù, Franco Melis, Filippo Tocco, Alberto Concu

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of applied physiology, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04201977 (Comparison of Different Forms of Recovery on the Functionality After Physical Exercise), which is not on this map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04201977 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Comparison of Different Forms of Recovery on the Functionality After Physical Exercise: Randomized Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversidade Federal de Santa MariaRan2019 to 2021Enrolled50ConditionsMassage, Inflammatory Response, Muscle, Skeletal, Cryotherapy EffectArmsFoam Roller Recovery, Active recovery, Immersion in cold water, Passive recovery
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Diving response after a one-week diet and overnight fasting.Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition · 2016
    Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Antonio CrisafulliDipartimento di Scienze Cliniche e Biologiche, Università degli Studi di Torino, Italy.
Valentina Orrù
Franco Melis
Filippo Tocco
Alberto Concu

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this work was to study the differences in cardiovascular response during two modes of recovery [active (AR): pedalling at 40 W; and passive (PR): complete rest seated] from a single bout of supramaximal exercise. Eight male amateur soccer players underwent two supramaximal cycle-ergometer tests, each consisting of pedalling against a resistance equivalent to 150% of the maximum workload achieved in a previous incremental test, followed by randomly assigned AR or PR. Cardiodynamic variables were obtained using an impedance cardiograph. Subjects were also connected to a sphygmomanometer, for systolic and diastolic blood pressure, and to a metabolimeter for oxygen uptake (VO(2)) assessments. We measured: heart rate (HR), stroke volume (SV), cardiac output (CO), the inverse of myocardial contractility calculated as pre-ejection period/left ventricular ejection time ratio (PEP/LVET), mean blood pressure (MBP), thoracic electrical impedance ( Z(0)) as an index of central blood volume, and arterio-venous oxygen difference (A-V O(2) Diff.). PR caused a lower CO compared to AR [mean (SE): 7 (0.7) vs. 10.4 (0.6) l.min(-1 )at the 5th min of recovery] due to lower HR [106.2 (3.6) vs. 121.8 (4.5) bpm at the 5th min of recovery], SV [67.1 (5) vs. 86.1 (4.8) ml at the 5th min of recovery], and PEP/VET values [0.44 (0.007) vs. 0.39 (0.015) at the 5th min of recovery]. No differences were found in MBP and Z(0) between PR and AR [95.1 (1.9) vs. 92.3 (2.7) mmHg and 26.2 (1.1) vs. 26.6 (1) Omega respectively at the 5th min of recovery], while A-V O(2) Diff. values were higher during AR than during PR [108.8 (4.3) vs. 75.2 (5.4) ml.l(-1) at the 5th min of recovery]. Thus, although after a single bout of supramaximal exercise SV and CO are lower during PR than during AR, these differences are not due to an impairment of cardiovascular function, but are fully explained by the lesser muscular engagement that leads to a reduction in stimuli deriving from mechanoreceptors and central commands, thus causing a faster return of myocardial contractility and HR to resting values.

Indexed as

HemodynamicsPhysical EnduranceAdultArteriesBicyclingBlood PressureBlood VolumeCardiac OutputCardiovascular Physiological PhenomenaElectric ImpedanceExerciseHeart RateHumansLegMaleMovementOxygen

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.