Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12665680›Full record

Trial reportMedical oncology (Northwood, London, England)2003

Docetaxel and vinorelbine: an effective regimen in recurrent squamous cell esophageal carcinoma.

Mario Airoldi, Giorgio Cortesina, Carlo Giordano, Fulvia Pedani, Cesare Bumma, Pietro Gabriele

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical TrialClinical Trial, Phase II
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England), 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01216527 (A Phase III, Multicenter Randomized Controlled Study of Neo-adjuvant Chemoradiotherapy Followed by Surgery Versus Surgery for Locally Advanced Squamous Cell Esophageal Carcinoma), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01216527 phase3unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2007, after this paper: background citation

A Phase III, Multicenter Randomized Controlled Study of Neo-adjuvant Chemoradiotherapy Followed by Surgery Versus Surgery for Locally Advanced Squamous Cell Esophageal Carcinoma

TypeinterventionalSponsorSun Yat-sen UniversityRan2007 to 2019Enrolled430ConditionsSquamous Cell Esophageal CarcinomaArmsNeo-adjuvant Chemoradiotherapy followed by Surgery, surgery
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Interventions for dysphagia in oesophageal cancer.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2014
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Esophageal cancer chemotherapy: recent advances.Gastrointestinal cancer research : GCR · 2008
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Mario AiroldiMedical Oncology Department, San Giovanni Antica Sede Hospital, Torino, Italy. mario.airoldi@jumpy.it
Giorgio Cortesina
Carlo Giordano
Fulvia Pedani
Cesare Bumma
Pietro Gabriele
Ospedale San Giovanni Antica Sede · ITFondazione Ricerca Molinette · ITCandiolo Cancer Institute · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vinorelbine and docetaxel are two effective drugs in esophageal cancer; our purpose was to evaluate efficacy and toxicity of a combination of these drugs in recurrent squamous cell esophageal cancer. Twenty patients previously treated with concomitant chemoradiotherapy (n = 14), surgery alone (n = 2), surgery plus radiotherapy (n = 2), or concomitant chemoradiotherapy + surgey (n = 2) were enrolled. Thirteen patients had a local-regional recurrence, two patients had metastases, and five patients had both. The doses were 80 mg/m(2) for docetaxel and 20 mg/m(2) for vinorelbine on d 1 every 21 d for a maximum of six cycles. Twenty patients received a total of 106 cycles (median per patient, 5). Neutropenia was the most frequent and severe side effect (grade 4 in 80%; grade 3 in 20%). The overall response rate was 60%, which included 3 of 20 complete responses (15%) and 9 of 20 partial responses (45%). Median response duration was 7 mo (2-50+). Overall median survival was 10.5 mo (range, 2-55+). A dysphagia improvement was observed in 81% of patients. In conclusion, the data from this phase II study indicate that this combination is effective in recurrent heavily pretreated patients with a short-lasting manageable toxicity.

Indexed as

TaxoidsAdultAgedAntineoplastic Agents, PhytogenicAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCarcinoma, Squamous CellDocetaxelDrug Administration ScheduleDrug SynergismEsophageal NeoplasmsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalAntineoplastic Agents, PhytogenicDocetaxelPaclitaxelTaxoidsVinblastineVinorelbine

Identifiers

PMID12665680
OpenAlexW2069554683

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.