Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12663356›Full record

Trial reportBritish journal of sports medicine2003

Effects of electrical stimulation on VO2 kinetics and delta efficiency in healthy young men.

M Pérez, A Lucia, A Santalla, J L Chicharro

Abstract readClinical TrialRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in British journal of sports medicine, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

M PérezFacultad de Ciencias de la Actividad Física y el Deporte, Universidad Europea de Madrid, E-28670 Villaviciosa de Odón, Madrid, Spain.
A Lucia
A Santalla
J L Chicharro

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine the effects of electrical stimulation (ES) on oxygen uptake (VO(2)) kinetics and delta efficiency (DE) during gradual exercise. The hypothesis was that ES would attenuate the VO(2)-workload relation and improve DE.

methodsFifteen healthy, untrained men (mean (SD) age 22 (5) years) were selected. Ten were electrostimulated on both quadriceps muscles with a frequency of 45-60 Hz, with 12 seconds of stimulation followed by eight seconds recovery for a total of 30 minutes a day, three days a week for six weeks. The remaining five subjects were assigned to a control group. A standardised exercise test on a cycle ergometer (ramp protocol, workload increases of 20 W/min) was performed by each subject before and after the experimental period. The slope of the VO(2)-power output (W) relation (deltaVO(2)/deltaW) and DE were calculated in each subject at moderate to high intensities (above the ventilatory threshold-that is, from 50-60% to 100% VO(2)max).

resultsThe mean (SEM) values for deltaVO(2)/deltaW and DE had significantly decreased and increased respectively after the six week ES programme (p<0.05; 9.8 (0.2) v 8.6 (0.5) ml O(2)/W/min respectively and 27.7 (0.9) v 31.5 (1.4)% respectively).

conclusionsES could be used as a supplementary tool to improve two of the main determinants of endurance capacity, namely VO(2) kinetics and work efficiency.

Indexed as

AdultElectric StimulationErgometryExercise TestHumansMaleMuscle, SkeletalNormal DistributionOxygen Consumption

Identifiers

PMID12663356
PMCPMC1724624

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.