ReviewPaediatric drugs2003
Pharmacokinetic considerations in the treatment of childhood epilepsy.
Review in Paediatric drugs, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Analysis of the Recurrence of Adverse Drug Reactions in Pediatric Patients with Epilepsy.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Toward the use of novel alternative methods in epilepsy modeling and drug discovery.Frontiers in neurology · 2023Review
- A Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Model for Optimally Profiling Lamotrigine Disposition and Drug-Drug Interactions.European journal of drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics · 2019Article
- AED Treatment Through Different Ages: As Our Brains Change, Should Our Drug Choices Also?Epilepsy currents · 2012Article
- Article
- Clinical pharmacokinetics of new-generation antiepileptic drugs at the extremes of age.Clinical pharmacokinetics · 2006Review
- Acute drug prescribing to children on chronic antiepilepsy therapy and the potential for adverse drug interactions in primary care.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2005Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Organogenesis throughout childhood affects almost every aspect of pediatric pharmacotherapy. The antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) are particularly impacted since most elimination rates are diminished for the first 6 months of infancy, but quickly attain and supersede adult values. When children enter a hypermetabolic stage, large doses of AEDs may be necessary to maintain effective serum concentrations. Medication noncompliance is frequently confused as hypermetabolism, since both present with low serum drug concentrations. Amazingly, noncompliance among children with chronic illness approaches a similar incidence to that reported in the adult population. It is obviously important to include this in the differential diagnosis of the etiology of subtherapeutic serum AED concentrations. Maturational differences also affect gastrointestinal drug absorption. Intestinal transit time and absorptive surface area are both diminished in young children. Drug delivery systems suitable in adults may not deliver the total dosage in children. Differences in the composition of body compartments and protein binding can alter the volume of drug distribution and, consequently, serum concentrations. In addition to pathophysiologic changes, there is evidence to suggest differences between a mature and immature brain. These differences include quantitative and qualitative responses to neurotransmitters. Hence, it is understandable why seizure semiology is different in children compared with adults. This constellation of factors contributes to the challenges of caring for children with epilepsy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.