Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12661811›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of pediatrics2003

Mental retardation.

Madhulika Kabra, Sheffali Gulati

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of pediatrics, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Madhulika KabraDepartment of Pediatrics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India. madhulikakabra@hotmail.com
Sheffali Gulati

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mental retardation (MR) occurs in 2-3% of the general population. Prevalence of milder MR is seven to ten times more than severe MR. Cause of severe MR can be determined in 60-70% of cases, as compared to mild MR where 35-55% remain idiopathic. The diagnostic process is aided considerably if the timing of a developmental insult can be determined: prenatal, periatal, postnatal (not mutually exclusive). History plays a pivotal role in approaching a diagnosis. After clinical evaluation one should be able to assess whether the disorder is static or progressive; approximate developmental quotient; possible timing of insult and possible underlying genetic etiology. Investigations should be based on history and physical examination. The important category of tests include: thyroid function tests, cytogenetic studies, metabolic work-up, fragile-X screening, radiological investigations, electrophysiological studies and specific tests according to the suspected diagnosis. Having an etiological explanation aids in the development of a specific treatment plan; helps families understand prognosis and recurrence risk and on the community level assists in the development of preventive strategies.

Indexed as

Intellectual DisabilityChildDown SyndromeFragile X SyndromeHumansPhysical Examination

Identifiers

PMID12661811

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.