Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12651879›Full record

ReviewGut2003

Haemochromatosis.

A Pietrangelo

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Gut, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Assessing the Non-tumorous Liver: Implications for Patient Management and Surgical Therapy.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2018
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Finger on the Pulse: Pumping Iron into Chickpea.Frontiers in plant science · 2017
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Analysis of HFE gene mutations and HLA-A alleles in Brazilian patients with iron overload.Sao Paulo medical journal = Revista paulista de medicina · 2006
    Article
  14. Where are all the iron men and women?Journal of molecular medicine (Berlin, Germany) · 2003
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

A PietrangeloDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Italy. pietrangelo.antonello@unimo.it
University of Modena and Reggio Emilia · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Iron is an important component of the Earth's crust, but its own chemistry greatly limits utilisation and also sets the basis for its toxicity. The capacity of readily exchanging electrons in aerobic conditions makes iron essential for fundamental cell functions, such as DNA synthesis, transport of oxygen and electrons, and cell respiration. On the other hand, as humans have no means to control iron excretion, excess iron, regardless of the route of entry, accumulates in parenchymal organs and threatens cell viability. In fact, a number of disease states (that is, iron overload diseases) attributable to genetic or acquired factors are pathogenetically linked to excess body iron stores and iron removal therapy is an effective lifesaving strategy in such circumstances.

Indexed as

Decision TreesGenetic TestingHemochromatosisHemochromatosis ProteinHistocompatibility Antigens Class IHumansIronIron OverloadMembrane ProteinsMutationHemochromatosis ProteinHFE protein, humanHistocompatibility Antigens Class IIronMembrane Proteins

Identifiers

PMID12651879
PMCPMC1867747
OpenAlexW4243418041

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.