ReviewCurrent urology reports2003
Tissue engineering in urology: where are we going?
Review in Current urology reports, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Different bladder defects reconstructed with bladder acellular matrix grafts in a rabbit model.Der Urologe. Ausg. A · 2011Article
- Does mechanical stimulation have any role in urinary bladder tissue engineering?World journal of urology · 2008Review
- In vivo bladder regeneration using small intestinal submucosa: experimental study.Pediatric surgery international · 2006Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Tissue engineering in urology is a broad term used to describe the development of alternative tissue sources for diseased or dysfunctional native urologic tissue. This article reviews the recently published techniques involving synthetic and natural biodegradable matrices alone, known as "unseeded" scaffolds, and the latest data on "seeded" scaffolds, which are impregnated with cultured cells from urologic organs. Recent discoveries in reporter gene labeling of urologic tissue are discussed as a new method to identify and track the fates of these transplanted cells in vivo. This article also investigates how these bioengineering techniques are applied to synthetic and natural scaffolds, such as polyglycolic acid and porcine small intestine submucosa, to increase bladder capacity, repair urethral strictures, and replace corporal plaques in Peyronie's disease. Furthermore, recently published reports that these materials have been seeded with chondrocytes to create corporal rods for penile prostheses and stents for ureteral and urethral stricture disease are discussed. With these latest developments as a foundation, the future directions of tissue engineering in urology are presented.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.