Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12648032›Full record

Trial reportPharmacoEconomics2003

A pharmacoeconomic evaluation of the Myocardial Ischaemia Reduction with Aggressive Cholesterol Lowering (MIRACL) study in the United Kingdom.

Nigel Buller, David Gillen, Roman Casciano, John Doyle, Koo Wilson

Abstract readClinical TrialRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in PharmacoEconomics, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. A pharmacoeconomic evaluation of the effects of atorvastatin on early recurrent ischemic events in acute coronary syndromes in Spain.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2004
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Nigel BullerDepartment of Cardiology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Edgbaston, Birmingham, UK.
David Gillen
Roman Casciano
John Doyle
Koo Wilson
Pfizer (United Kingdom) · GBPfizer (United States) · USQueen Elizabeth Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine the short-term healthcare costs associated with intensive lipid lowering with atorvastatin initiated within 24-96 hours of the occurrence of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) in patients in the UK.

methodsPatient-level clinical outcome data from the Myocardial Ischaemia Reduction with Aggressive Cholesterol Lowering (MIRACL) trial and standard cost data were used to compare the total expected 16-week cost per patient on atorvastatin 80 mg/day versus placebo. Clinical outcomes assessed included the following: death; cardiac arrest with resuscitation; nonfatal myocardial infarction; worsening angina pectoris with objective evidence of myocardial ischaemia requiring rehospitalisation; surgical or percutaneous coronary revascularisation; nonfatal stroke; hospitalisation for angina without objective evidence of myocardial ischaemia; and new or worsening congestive heart failure requiring rehospitalisation. All relevant direct medical costs from the perspective of the NHS were considered.

resultsThe total expected cost was pound 784.05 per patient in the placebo cohort and pound 851.59 per patient in the atorvastatin cohort, resulting in an incremental cost of pound 67.54 per patient in the atorvastatin group. The cost per event avoided was pound 1762.04. A third of the cost of atorvastatin treatment was offset within 16 weeks by the cost savings resulting from the reduction in the number of events in the atorvastatin cohort compared with the placebo cohort.

conclusionThe clinical benefits of short-term intensive atorvastatin treatment administered after ACS is attainable through a marginal increase in 'upfront' costs.

Indexed as

Anticholesteremic AgentsAtorvastatinCholesterolCohort StudiesCost-Benefit AnalysisDouble-Blind MethodEndpoint DeterminationHealth Care CostsHeptanoic AcidsHospitalizationHumansHypercholesterolemiaMyocardial IschemiaPyrrolesTreatment OutcomeUnited KingdomAnticholesteremic AgentsAtorvastatinCholesterolHeptanoic AcidsPyrroles

Identifiers

PMID12648032
OpenAlexW2090099646

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.