ReviewCurrent diabetes reports2002
Patient-centered diabetes self-management education.
Review in Current diabetes reports, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluation of provider documentation patterns as a tool to deliver ongoing patient-centred diabetes education and support.International journal of clinical practice · 2020Article
- Effectiveness of Diabetes Self-Management Educational Programs For Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients In Middle East Countries: A Systematic Review.Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy · 2020Review
- Structural model of patient-centered communication and diabetes management in early emerging adults at the transfer to adult care.Journal of behavioral medicine · 2019Observational
- Metabolic factors that affect health-related quality of life in type 2 diabetes patients: a multivariate regression analysis.Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy · 2019Article
- Analysis of the Relationship between the Referral and Evolution of Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2018Observational
- A Revised Version of Diabetes Quality of Life Instrument Maintaining Domains for Satisfaction, Impact, and Worry.Journal of diabetes research · 2018Article
- The introduction of self-management in Type 2 Diabetes care: A narrative review.Journal of education and health promotion · 2012Article
- Assessing the need for diabetes self-management education in the Oklahoma city vietnamese community.Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders · 2011Article
- Changing office practice and health care systems to facilitate diabetes self-management.Current diabetes reports · 2003Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Diabetes self-management education (DSME) has been shown to improve health outcomes. Yet, relatively little is known about how DSME has its effects. Literature reviewed from the past 3 years indicates that if DSME is to become more effective interventions need to be theory-based, to increase patient involvement in their care, and to encompass a broader array of evidenced-based outcomes. Outcomes reviewed go beyond knowledge and glycemic control to include prevention of diabetes, quality of life, and reduction of cardiovascular risk. The ability of practitioners and health care systems to implement, adopt, and maintain patient-centered interventions over time is discussed. By linking theory to behavior, and broadening the outcomes examined, advances can continue to be made in closing the gap between the scientific base for the treatment of diabetes, and the care and outcomes patients experience. Further research on patient-centered approaches that promote self-management is seen as critical in closing this gap.
Indexed as
Identifiers
12647700What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.