Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12644814›Full record

Trial reportBritish journal of cancer2003

Phase I/II trial of weekly cisplatin, etoposide, and irinotecan chemotherapy for metastatic lung cancer: JCOG 9507.

I Sekine, Y Nishiwaki, R Kakinuma, K Kubota, F Hojo, T Matsumoto, H Ohmatsu, K Goto, T Kodama, K Eguchi and 6 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical TrialClinical Trial, Phase IClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in British journal of cancer, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Prevention of irinotecan associated diarrhea by intestinal alkalization. A pilot study in gastrointestinal cancer patients.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2006
    Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

I SekineInternal Medicine and Thoracic Oncology Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tsukiji 5-1-1, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, Japan. isekine@ncc.go.jp
Y Nishiwaki
R Kakinuma
K Kubota
F Hojo
T Matsumoto
H Ohmatsu
K Goto
T Kodama
K Eguchi
T Shinkai
T Tamura
Y Ohe
H Kunitoh
K Yoshimura
N Saijo
National Cancer Center Hospital East · JPNational Cancer Research Institute · GBNational Cancer Center · USNational Cancer Centre Japan · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Combinations of cisplatin-irinotecan and cisplatin-etoposide are active and well tolerated in patients with both small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) and nonsmall-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). To define the recommended dose for phase II trials of irinotecan combined with cisplatin and etoposide in chemonaive patients with stage IV disease, 56 patients (11 having SCLC and 45 NSCLC) received cisplatin 25 mg m(-2) weekly for 9 weeks, etoposide 60 mg m(-2) for 3 days on weeks 1, 3, 5, 7 and 9, and irinotecan 20-100 mg m(-2) (levels 1-8) on weeks 2, 4, 6 and 8, together with a prophylactical granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support (50 microg m(-2) on days 4-7 on weeks 1, 3, 5, 7 and 9, and on days 2-7 on weeks 2, 4, 6 and 8). Grade 3-4 leukocytopenia, neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were noted in 20 (36%), 28 (50%) and nine (16%) patients, respectively. Grade 3 diarrhoea, grade 3 cardiac toxicity, and grade 4 transaminase elevation developed in one (1.8%) patient each. Totally, four of 56 patients were removed from the study because of toxicity and recovered, and two other patients died in situations where drug toxicity might contribute to their death. Dose-limiting toxicity was noted in less than one-third of patients at dose levels 1-7, but in all patients at dose level 8. Thus, the recommended dose was determined to be level 7 (irinotecan 90 mg m(-2)). The response rates for SCLC and NSCLC were 91% (10/11) and 38% (17/45), respectively. The median survival time and 1-year survival rate were 11.9 months and 46% for SCLC and 10.1 months and 40% for NSCLC, respectively. This regimen was considered to be feasible and promising for the treatment of stage IV SCLC and NSCLC.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCamptothecinCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungCarcinoma, Small CellCisplatinDiarrheaDose-Response Relationship, DrugEtoposideFemaleGranulocyte Colony-Stimulating FactorHumansInfusions, IntravenousIrinotecanLeukopeniaCamptothecinCisplatinEtoposideGranulocyte Colony-Stimulating FactorIrinotecan

Identifiers

PMID12644814
PMCPMC2377075
OpenAlexW1966160399

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.