Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12643160›Full record

ReviewCurrent diabetes reports2002

Blood pressure control--effects on diabetic nephropathy progression: how low does blood pressure have to be?

Christopher A Newton, Philip Raskin

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current diabetes reports, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 81% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Christopher A NewtonDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, 5323 Harry Hines Boulevard, G5.238, Dallas, TX 75390-8858, USA.
Philip Raskin
The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hypertension and diabetes are independent risk factors for both cardiovascular disease and renal complications. Coexistence of these comorbid conditions predisposes the patient to a much greater risk of progression to end-stage renal disease. Combined with the increased cardiovascular mortality, this has led to recent Joint National Committee-VI recommendations for the initiation of antihypertensive therapy for people with diabetes at a blood pressure of 130/85 mm Hg, a level lower than that recommended for the nondiabetic population. Results of a review of recently published investigations on the effects of blood pressure on diabetic nephropathy progression are presented in this article. This review finds evidence to support reducing the mean arterial blood pressure to levels below 95 mm Hg, a level that is even lower than the blood pressure of 130/80 mm Hg (mean arterial pressure of 97 mm Hg) recommended by the American Diabetes Association and National Kidney Foundation. The effect of blood pressure on renal disease progression is linear and appears to have no lower threshold for the benefits of blood pressure reduction on limiting nephropathy progression. The answer to the question of how low does blood pressure have to be to minimize the effects of blood pressure on diabetic nephropathy progression might be "the lower, the better."

Indexed as

Blood PressureAntihypertensive AgentsDiabetic NephropathiesHumansHypertension, RenalRisk FactorsAntihypertensive Agents

Identifiers

PMID12643160
OpenAlexW2112432092

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.