ReviewDrugs & aging2003
Novel drug delivery systems for insulin: clinical potential for use in the elderly.
Review in Drugs & aging, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene):polystyrene sulfonate (PEDOT:PSS) as an insulin carrier in silk fibroin hydrogels for transdermal deliveryRSC advances · 2024Article
- Are inhaled systemic therapies a viable option for the treatment of the elderly patient?Drugs & aging · 2008Review
- Exubera(®) (inhaled insulin): an evidence-based review of its effectiveness in the management of diabetes.Core evidence · 2005Article
- Waiting to inhale: noninjectable insulin, are we there yet?Current diabetes reports · 2004Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Diabetes mellitus is a very common disease in the elderly and its complications are responsible for excess morbidity/mortality, loss of independence and impaired quality of life. Recent studies, while not performed in the elderly, have outlined the importance of achieving tight glycaemic control in order to prevent complications. Eighty years after its discovery, subcutaneous insulin remains a major treatment for diabetes. It is used as a first-line agent in type 1 diabetes, and in type 2 diabetes when oral antihyperglycaemic agents combined with diet and exercise fail to achieve an appropriate metabolic control. To avoid injections, other routes of insulin administration have been studied, including oral, dermal and rectal routes but they were not found to be appropriate for clinical use. Buccal or nasal insulin combined with absorption enhancers proved to have interesting properties. Inhaled insulin appears to be suitable for use in patients with diabetes because of its better bioavailability and a pharmacokinetic profile that mimics the time kinetics of insulin secretion after a meal. Clinical studies were conducted among small numbers of patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes who had been treated with subcutaneous insulin. Inhaled insulin was given three times daily, just before meals, and was combined with a bedtime subcutaneous injection of long-acting insulin. In patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes the metabolic control achieved with inhaled insulin was similar to that obtained with a subcutaneous insulin regimen. Tolerance of inhaled insulin was good and treatment satisfaction was better than that with the subcutaneous regimen. Insulin inhalation appears to be an interesting way of insulin delivery for elderly patients with diabetes. However, no studies have been conducted in elderly patients with diabetes to assess this route's acceptability, convenience and ease of use in this particular population. In addition, it is necessary to conduct pharmacokinetic studies in the elderly because lung aging might reduce the bioavailability of inhaled insulin.
Indexed as
Identifiers
12641486What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.