ArticleJournal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry2003
Neuropsychological prediction of conversion to dementia from questionable dementia: statistically significant but not yet clinically useful.
Article in Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 67 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effect of hearing aids on cognitive functions in middle-aged and older adults with hearing loss: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2022Pooled it
- Hormone therapy and cognitive function.Human reproduction updatePooled it
- Balancing the efforts of chart review and gains in PRS prediction accuracy: An empirical study.Journal of biomedical informatics · 2024Article
- A scoping review of neurodegenerative manifestations in explainable digital phenotyping.NPJ Parkinson's disease · 2023Article
- The predictive value of the memory impairment screen in patients with subjective memory complaints: a prospective study.The primary care companion for CNS disorders · 2013Article
- Identification of potential or preclinical cognitive impairment and the implications of sophisticated screening with biomarkers and cognitive testing: does it really matter?BioMed research international · 2013Review
- Reduced benefit from mnemonic strategies in early-stage Alzheimer's disease: a brief testing-the-limits paradigm for clinical practice.Journal of neurology · 2010Article
- Task context and organization in free recall.Neuropsychologia · 2009Article
- Neuropsychological contributions to the early identification of Alzheimer's disease.Neuropsychology review · 2008Review
- Transitions to mild cognitive impairments, dementia, and death: findings from the Nun Study.American journal of epidemiology · 2007Article
- Mild cognitive impairment in different functional domains and incident Alzheimer's disease.Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry · 2005Article
- Neuropsychological markers of progression from mild cognitive impairment to Alzheimer's disease.American journal of Alzheimer's disease and other dementiasArticle
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundVerbal memory impairment, one of the earliest signs of Alzheimer's disease (AD), may help identify people with cognitive impairment, insufficient for a diagnosis of dementia (questionable dementia: QD), at risk of developing AD. Other cognitive parameters have been found that may indicate which people with QD will go on to develop dementia. Nevertheless, some researchers have reported only partial success in differentiating between mild AD and age related cognitive impairment.
objectivesTo discover if there are early, pre-clinical cognitive markers that could help identify patients attending our memory clinic who were at risk of developing dementia.
methodsMultidisciplinary assessment of a consecutive sample of 195 patients with QD seen in a National Health Service hospital outpatient clinic; 135 seen for a mean follow up of 24.5 months.
resultsConversion rate to dementia was 27.4% (37 of 135). A diagnosis of probable or possible AD was made in 15.6% (21 of 135) of cases. Despite statistically significant differences in some cognitive tasks between those who did and those who did not go on to dement, Cox regression analyses failed to improve prediction rates markedly above base rates and were unstable.
conclusionA large number of studies claim good prediction of conversion to dementia using cognitive test scores. Although this study produced similarly good sensitivity and specificity values, proper consideration of the statistical analyses and their clinical significance suggested that these prediction methods are currently too imprecise for clinical use. Use of cognitive indicators combined with neuroradiological, neuropathological, and genetic factors for predicting conversion to dementia might prove more reliable but may be beyond the scope of many geriatric services.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.