ArticleQuality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation2003
Health-related quality of life in patients with coronary artery disease treated for angina: validity and reliability of German translations of two specific questionnaires.
Article in Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
33 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluation of a Web-Based Self-Management Program for Patients With Cardiovascular Disease: Explorative Randomized Controlled Trial.Journal of medical Internet research · 2020Trial
- Trial
- A Longitudinal Study on Development and Validation of the Prostate Cancer Scale Among the System of Quality of Life Instruments for Patients with Cancer (QLICP-PR V2.0) Based on Classical Test Theory and Generalizability Theory.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Fatigue, Depression and Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients with Post-Myocardial Infarction during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Results from the Augsburg Myocardial Infarction Registry.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Health related quality of life of patients following mechanical valve replacement surgery for rheumatic mitral stenosis in Tanzania.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2023Article
- Differential associations of emotional and physical domains of the MacNew Heart with changes in 6-min walking test.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2023Article
- Reliability and validity of the Korean version of the MacNew heart disease Health-related Quality of Life questionnaire.Health and quality of life outcomes · 2021Article
- Efficacy of team-based collaborative care for distressed patients in secondary prevention of chronic coronary heart disease (TEACH): study protocol of a multicenter randomized controlled trial.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2020Article
- Functional status and life satisfaction of patients with stable angina pectoris in Austria.BMJ open · 2019Observational
- Measuring HRQoL following heart valve surgery: the HeartQoL questionnaire is a valid and reliable core heart disease instrument.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2019Article
- Translation and psychometric testing of the Farsi version of the Seattle angina questionnaire.Health and quality of life outcomes · 2017Article
- Development and validation of the nasopharyngeal cancer scale among the system of quality of life instruments for cancer patients (QLICP-NA V2.0): combined classical test theory and generalizability theory.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2016Article
- Psychometric evaluation of the Sinhalese version of MacNew Heart Disease Health Related Quality of Life Questionnaire in patients with stable angina.Health and quality of life outcomes · 2016Article
- Article
- The MacNew Questionnaire Is a Helpful Tool for Predicting Unplanned Hospital Readmissions After Coronary Revascularization.Journal of clinical medicine research · 2016Article
- Test-retest reliability of HeartQoL and its comparability to the MacNew heart disease health-related quality of life questionnaire.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2016Article
- Sex differences in the quality of life of patients with acute coronary syndrome treated with percutaneous coronary intervention after a 3-year follow-up.Patient preference and adherence · 2016Article
- The Relationship Between Periodontal Disease and Public Health: A Population-Based Study.Global journal of health science · 2015Article
- The Italian MacNew heart disease health-related quality of life questionnaire: a validation study.Internal and emergency medicine · 2015Article
- Conversion of the Seattle Angina Questionnaire into EQ-5D utilities for ischemic heart disease: a systematic review and catalog of the literature.ClinicoEconomics and outcomes research : CEOR · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The German versions of two patient-perceived heart disease specific health-related quality of life (HRQL) questionnaires, the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) and the MacNew Heart Disease questionnaire, were examined for their psychometric properties in patients with angiographically documented coronary artery disease and angina who were treated either medically or invasively and followed up for 1 year. Both HRQL questionnaires and the modified Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) angina-associated disability scale were completed by 158 patients at baseline and 12 months later when they also completed a generic health status questionnaire, the SF-36. Both specific HRQL questionnaires were acceptable to patients. Three of the four MacNew scales, but none of the SAQ scales, discriminated between patients by baseline CCS disability levels I and IV. Internal consistency ranged from 0.75 to 0.94 for the SAQ and from 0.86 to 0.97 for the MacNew scales. Test-retest reliability over a 4-week period of time ranged from 0.45 to 0.81 for the SAQ scales and 0.61 to 0.68 for the MacNew scales. Over 12 months, HRQL improved (p < 0.001) on three of the five SAQ and on all four of the MacNew scales with the responsiveness statistic ranging from 0.59 to 1.55 for the SAQ and 0.86 to 1.12 for the MacNew. The 12 month scores on all SAQ and MacNew scales were significantly higher in patients who improved than those who deteriorated on the SF-36 reported health transition question. We conclude that the SAQ and the MacNew are both valid, reliable, and responsive in German, that the MacNew discriminates better between angina grades at baseline, that HRQL improves over 12 months with both measures, that the SAQ angina frequency and disease perception scales have the largest effect sizes, and that the 12-month change in HRQL with both instruments was associated with change in SF-36 reported health transition status.
Indexed as
Identifiers
12639066What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.