Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12637943›Full record

ArticleCancer gene therapy2003

Neoadjuvant treatment of hepatic malignancy: an oncolytic herpes simplex virus expressing IL-12 effectively treats the parent tumor and protects against recurrence-after resection.

W R Jarnagin, J S Zager, D Klimstra, K A Delman, S Malhotra, M Ebright, S Little, B DeRubertis, S F Stanziale, M Hezel and 2 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer gene therapy, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Personalizing Oncolytic Immunovirotherapy Approaches.Molecular diagnosis & therapy · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The use of oncolytic virotherapy in the neoadjuvant setting.Journal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2022
    Review
  9. Targeted Delivery of IL-12 Adjuvants Immunotherapy by Oncolytic Viruses.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2021
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. HSV Recombinant Vectors for Gene Therapy.The open virology journal · 2010
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Gene therapy of liver cancer.World journal of gastroenterology · 2006
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

W R JarnaginDepartment of Surgery, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10021, USA. jarnagi@mskcc.org
J S Zager
D Klimstra
K A Delman
S Malhotra
M Ebright
S Little
B DeRubertis
S F Stanziale
M Hezel
H Federoff
Y Fong
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USUniversity of Rochester · US

Funding

SURGICAL ONCOLOGY RESEARCH TRAINING PROGRAMT32CA009501 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Babak J Mehrara · 1985 to 2026
$7.7M
Liver Regeneration in Man--Effects or Adjuvant TherapyR01CA075416 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI FONG, YUMAN · 1997 to 2005
$1.5M
THERAPY OF HEPATIC METASTASES FROM COLORECTAL CARCINOMAR01CA061524 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI KEMENY, NANCY E · 1993 to 2001
$259k
NCI NIH HHS R01CA61524NCI NIH HHS R01CA75416NCI NIH HHS R01CA76232NCI NIH HHS T32 CA 09501
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective of the study was to evaluate the utility of NV1042, a replication competent, oncolytic herpes simplex virus (HSV) containing the interleukin-12 (IL-12) gene, as primary treatment for hepatic tumors and to further assess its ability to reduce tumor recurrence following resection. Resection is the most effective therapy for hepatic malignancies, but is not possible in the majority of the patients. Furthermore, recurrence is common after resection, most often in the remnant liver and likely because of microscopic residual disease in the setting of postoperative host cellular immune dysfunction. We hypothesize that, unlike other gene transfer approaches, direct injection of liver tumors with replication competent, oncolytic HSV expressing IL-12 will not only provide effective control of the parent tumor, but will also elicit an immune response directed at residual tumor cells, thus decreasing the risk of cancer recurrence after resection. Solitary Morris hepatomas, established in Buffalo rat livers, were injected directly with 10(7) particles of NV1042, NV1023, an oncolytic HSV identical to NV1042 but without the IL-12 gene, or with saline. Following tumor injection, the parent tumors were resected and measured and the animals were challenged with an intraportal injection of 10(5) tumor cells, recreating the clinical scenario of residual microscopic cancer. In vitro cytotoxicity against Morris hepatoma cells was similar for both viruses at a multiplicity of infection of 1 (MOI, ratio of viral particles to target cells), with >90% tumor cell kill by day 6. NV1042 induced high-level expression of IL-12 in vitro, peaking after 4 days in culture. Furthermore, a single intratumoral injection of NV1042, but not NV1023, induced marked IL-12 and interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma) expression. Both viruses induced a significant local immune response as evidenced by an increase in the number of intratumoral CD4(+) and CD8(+) lymphocytes, although the peak of CD8(+) infiltration was later with NV1042 compared with NV1023. NV1042 and NV1023 reduced parent tumor volume by 74% (P<.003) and 52% (P<.03), respectively, compared to control animals. Treatment of established tumors with NV1042, but not with NV1023, significantly reduced the number of hepatic tumors after resection of the parent tumor and rechallenge (16.8+/-11 (median=4) vs. 65.9+/-15 (median=66) in control animals, P<.025). In conclusion, oncolytic HSV therapy combined with local immune stimulation with IL-12 offers effective control of parent hepatic tumors and also protects against microscopic residual disease after resection. The ease of use of this combined modality approach, which appears to be superior to either approach alone, suggests that it may have clinical relevance, both as primary treatment for patients with unresectable tumors and also as a neoadjuvant strategy for reducing recurrence after resection.

Indexed as

AnimalsCD4-Positive T-LymphocytesCD8-Positive T-LymphocytesCell Line, TumorGenetic VectorsGranulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating FactorHepatectomyHerpesvirus 1, HumanInterferon-gammaInterleukin-12Liver Neoplasms, ExperimentalMaleNeoadjuvant TherapyNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalRatsGranulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating FactorInterferon-gammaInterleukin-12

Identifiers

PMID12637943
OpenAlexW2000859892

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.