Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12634359›Full record

ArticleJournal of virology2003

Distinct mechanisms of neutralization by monoclonal antibodies specific for sites in the N-terminal or C-terminal domain of murine leukemia virus SU.

Michael Dominic Burkhart, Samuel C Kayman, Yuxian He, Abraham Pinter

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of virology, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Furin cleavage of the Moloney murine leukemia virus Env precursor reorganizes the spike structure.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2014
    Article
  6. Conformational inactivation induces immunogenicity of the receptor-binding pocket of a bacterial adhesin.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2013
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Michael Dominic BurkhartLaboratory of Retroviral Biology, Public Health Research Institute, Newark, New Jersey 07103-3535, USA.
Samuel C Kayman
Yuxian He
Abraham Pinter

Funding

ANTIGENIC PROPERTIES OF THE V1/V2 DOMAIN OF HIV-1 GP120R01AI046283 · NIAID · UNIV OF MED/DENT OF NJ-NJ MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI PINTER, ABRAHAM · 2000 to 2010
$5.1M
Antigenic properties of the V1/V2 domain of HIV-1 gp120R56AI046283 · NIAID · PUBLIC HEALTH RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI PINTER, ABRAHAM · 2005 to 2005
$493k
ANTIGENIC PROPERTIES OF THE V1/V2 DOMAIN OF HIV-1 GP120R21AI046283 · NIAID · PUBLIC HEALTH RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI PINTER, ABRAHAM · 2000 to 2000
$111k
NIAID NIH HHS AI46283NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI046283NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI046283NIAID NIH HHS R56 AI046283
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The epitope specificities and functional activities of monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) specific for the murine leukemia virus (MuLV) SU envelope protein subunit were determined. Neutralizing antibodies were directed towards two distinct sites in MuLV SU: one overlapping the major receptor-binding pocket in the N-terminal domain and the other involving a region that includes the most C-terminal disulfide-bonded loop. Two other groups of MAbs, reactive with distinct sites in the N-terminal domain or in the proline-rich region (PRR), did not neutralize MuLV infectivity. Only the neutralizing MAbs specific for the receptor-binding pocket were able to block binding of purified SU and MuLV virions to cells expressing the ecotropic MuLV receptor, mCAT-1. Whereas the neutralizing MAbs specific for the C-terminal domain did not interfere with the SU-mCAT-1 interaction, they efficiently inhibited cell-to-cell fusion mediated by MuLV Env, indicating that they interfered with a postattachment event necessary for fusion. The C-terminal domain MAbs displayed the highest neutralization titers and binding activities. However, the nonneutralizing PRR-specific MAbs bound to intact virions with affinities similar to those of the neutralizing receptor-binding pocket-specific MAbs, indicating that epitope exposure, while necessary, is not sufficient for viral neutralization by MAbs. These results identify two separate neutralization domains in MuLV SU and suggest a role for the C-terminal domain in a postattachment step necessary for viral fusion.

Indexed as

Antibodies, MonoclonalAmino Acid SequenceAnimalsAntibodies, ViralAntigens, ViralBinding SitesCell LineCricetinaeEpitope MappingEpitopesFriend murine leukemia virusHumansHybridomasLeukemia Virus, MurineMembrane GlycoproteinsMiceAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, ViralAntigens, Viralecotropic murine leukemia virus receptorEpitopesMembrane GlycoproteinsReceptors, VirusRetroviridae Proteins, OncogenicViral Envelope Proteins

Identifiers

PMID12634359
PMCPMC150638

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.