Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12632501›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of gastroenterology2003

Antitumor immunopreventive and immunotherapeutic effect in mice induced by hybrid vaccine of dendritic cells and hepatocarcinoma in vivo.

Jin-Kun Zhang, Jun Li, Juan Zhang, Hai-Bin Chen, Su-Biao Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of gastroenterology, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Novel dendritic cell-based vaccination in late stage melanoma.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2014
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Regulation of tumor immunity by tumor/dendritic cell fusions.Clinical & developmental immunology · 2010
    Review
  7. Cancer vaccine by fusions of dendritic and cancer cells.Clinical & developmental immunology · 2009
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. DC-SIGN: binding receptor for HCV?World journal of gastroenterology · 2004
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jin-Kun ZhangCancer Pathology Laboratory, Shantou University Medical College, 22 Xinlinglu, Shantou 515031, Guangdong Province, China. jkzhang@stu.edu.cn
Jun Li
Juan Zhang
Hai-Bin Chen
Su-Biao Chen
Shantou University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo develop atumor vaccine by fusion of H22 hepatocarcinoma cells and DC, and to study its protective and therapeutical effect against H22 cell.

methodsH22-DC vaccine was produced by PEG fusion of H22 and DC induced by cytokine released from splenic mononuclear cells, sorted by CD11c magnetic microbead marker. It was injected through the tail vein of the mice and the H(22)-DC oncogenesis was detected in the liver, spleen and lung. In order to study the therapeutical and protective effect of H(22)-DC against tumor H(22), two groups were divided: immune group and therapeutic group. Immune group was further divided into P, D, HD and H subgroups, immunized by PBS, DC, H(22)-DC and inactivated H(22), respectively, and attacked by H(22) cell. The tumor size, tumor weight, mice survival time and tumor latent period were recorded and statistically analyzed; Therapeutical group was divided into three subgroups of P, D and HD, and attacked by H(22), then treated with PBS, DC, and H(22)-DC, respectively. Pathology and flow cytometry were also applied to study the mechanism how the H(22)-DC vaccine attacked on the H(22) cell.

results1. No oncogenesis was found in spleen, lung and liver after H22-DC injection. 2. Hybrid vaccine immunized mice had strongest CTL activity. 3. In the immune group, latent period was longer in HD subgroup than that in P, H and D subgroup; and tumor size and weight were smaller in HD subgroup than that in P, H and D subgroup. 4. In therapeutic group, tumor size was smaller in HD subgroup than that in P, D subgroup.

conclusion1. H22-DC tumor vaccine is safe without oncogenesis in vivo. 2. Hybrid vaccine can stimulate potent specific CTL activity against H22. 3. H22-DC vaccine has distinctive prophylatic effect on tumor H22 and can inhibit the tumor growth.

Indexed as

Cell FusionDendritic CellsAnimalsCancer VaccinesCarcinoma, HepatocellularCell LineImmunotherapyLiver NeoplasmsMiceMice, Inbred BALB CNeoplasmsCancer Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID12632501
PMCPMC4621565
OpenAlexW2418816510

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.