ReviewSurgical endoscopy2003
Acute biliary pancreatitis, endoscopy, and laparoscopy.
Review in Surgical endoscopy, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- The role of laparoendoscopic surgery in acute pancreatitis.Surgical endoscopy · 2011Article
- Laparo-endoscopic "Rendezvous" to treat cholecysto-choledocolithiasis: Effective, safe and simplifies the endoscopist's work.World journal of gastroenterology · 2008Article
- Acute biliary pancreatitis and cholecystolithiasis in a child: one time treatment with laparoendoscopic "rendez-vous" procedure.World journal of gastroenterology · 2006Article
- Laparoscopy for abdominal emergencies: evidence-based guidelines of the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery.Surgical endoscopy · 2006Review
- Noninvasive imaging of the common bile duct before invasive imaging after biliary pancreatitis.Surgical endoscopy · 2004Article
- [Gallbladder calculi--always an indication for surgery?].Der Internist · 2004Article
- Biliary pancreatitis.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary TractReview
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Current practices for diagnosis and treatment of common bile duct stones are not evidence-based. Acute biliary pancreatitis (ABP) is a specific situation in which endoscopic procedures are either overused or misused. Pancreatitis is a poor marker for choledocholithiasis. Prognostic systems are accurate to discern those patients with ABP who do not need aggressive procedures. Patients with a benign ABP do not need an endoscopic approach. Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration is an underrated treatment for patients with choledocholithiasis. Laparoscopic approach to infected necrotic collections and pseudocysts warrant further investigations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.