Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12631396›Full record

ArticleBreast cancer research : BCR2003

C-myc, not HER-2/neu, can predict recurrence and mortality of patients with node-negative breast cancer.

Claus M Schlotter, Ulf Vogt, Ulrich Bosse, Berthold Mersch, Katja Wassmann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Breast cancer research : BCR, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. The ROCK signaling and breast cancer metastasis.Molecular biology reports · 2011
    Review
  13. MYC and Breast Cancer.Genes & cancer · 2010
    Article
  14. Expression of cell cycle proteins in male breast carcinoma.World journal of surgical oncology · 2010
    Article
  15. Article
  16. MYC in breast tumor progression.Expert review of anticancer therapy · 2008
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Early breast cancer.International journal of clinical oncology · 2006
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Claus M SchlotterFrauenklinik Klinikum Ibbenbueren, Ibbenbueren, Germany. C.Schlotter@Klinikum-Ibbenbueren.de
Ulf Vogt
Ulrich Bosse
Berthold Mersch
Katja Wassmann

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAt present, node-negative, high-risk breast cancer patients cannot be identified with sufficient accuracy. Consequently, further strong prognostic factors are needed.

methodsAmong 181 node-negative breast cancer (NNBC) patients, c-myc and HER-2/neu oncogenes were identified prospectively using double differential PCR. The possible impact of amplification of those oncogenes on disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival was examined. Furthermore, the possible effects of adjuvant therapies on rate of recurrence and mortality in oncogene-amplified NNBC patients were investigated.

resultsThe prevalence rates for amplification of c-myc and HER-2/neu were 21.5% and 30.4%, respectively. On univariate analysis, c-myc-amplified NNBCs were associated with significantly shorter DFS at 36 months after the initial diagnosis (85.3% versus 97.3%). As compared with nonamplified cancers, HER-2/neu-amplified NNBCs did not exhibit any significant differences after 36 months and 95 months. Multivariate analysis indicated that c-myc amplification and tumour size, in contrast to HER-2/neu amplification, oestrogen receptor status, grading and age, were the only independent parameters for DFS. During the period of observation, we found no evidence for an impact of amplification of the oncogenes on overall survival in all cases. With respect to various adjuvant systemic therapies such as chemotherapy (cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, 5-fluorouracil; fluorouracil, epirubicin, cyclophosphamide) and endocrine therapy (tamoxifen), no significant differences were identified in oncogene-amplified NNBC patients in terms of DFS and overall survival. However, those c-myc-amplified NNBC patients who did not receive adjuvant systemic therapy exhibited significantly shorter DFS and overall survival as compared with c-myc-nonamplified patients.

conclusionC-myc amplification appears to be a strong prognostic marker with which to predict early recurrence in NNBC patients. C-myc-amplified NNBC patients without adjuvant systemic therapy experienced shorter DFS and overall survival.

Indexed as

AdultBreast NeoplasmsDNA, NeoplasmErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesFemaleHumansMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPolymerase Chain ReactionPredictive Value of TestsPrognosisProto-Oncogene Proteins c-mycSurvival AnalysisSurvival RateDNA, NeoplasmErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesProto-Oncogene Proteins c-myc

Identifiers

PMID12631396
PMCPMC154146

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.