Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12630980›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of clinical pharmacology2003

Who receives lipid-lowering drugs: the effects of comorbidities and patient characteristics on treatment initiation.

Chen-Chang Yang, Susan S Jick, Marcia A Testa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Statin use in Canadians: trends, determinants and persistence.Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Chen-Chang YangDepartment of Medicine, School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, 155 Li-Nong, Street, Section 2, Taipei, Taiwan 11217.
Susan S Jick
Marcia A Testa

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsLittle is known about the effects of comorbidities and patient characteristics on treatment initiation of lipid-lowering drugs (LLDs), which can be helpful in the evaluation of the risks and benefits of LLDs.

methodsBaseline characteristics among subjects who received their first ever-recorded LLD prescription in general practice between 1 January 1990 and 31 December 1997, and hyperlipidaemic patients without LLD therapy during the same period were obtained from the UK General Practice Research Database. Differences between patients who received and patients who did not receive LLDs, as well as patients who received different classes of LLDs were compared by fitting multivariate logistic regression models that adjusted for age, sex, body mass index, smoking status, and year of treatment initiation or hyperlipidaemia diagnosis.

resultsWe found that there were many differences in the baseline characteristics, such as number of general practitioner visits, diagnosis and severity of cardiovascular diseases, and concurrent medications, between the 25 331 patients who received and the 16 287 patients who did not receive LLDs. We also noted that patients with statin therapy had more prior hospitalization, more recent myocardial infarction/stroke, and more concurrent cardiovascular medications, than those patients who received other LLDs.

conclusionsPatients who received LLDs in primary care, especially patients with statin therapy, were more likely to be elderly and to have more concomitant severe cardiovascular comorbidities than those hyperlipidaemic patients who did not receive LLDs. Examining the medical records of individuals eligible for LLD therapy is an important first step in selectively targeting who will experience the greatest benefit to risk ratio for the treatment of hyperlipidaemia, and is an important step in avoiding confounding by indication when designing epidemiological studies comparing the risks and benefits of treatments for hyperlipidaemia.

Indexed as

AdultAgedCoronary DiseaseDiabetes ComplicationsFemaleHeart FailureHumansHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsHyperlipidemiasHypolipidemic AgentsMaleMiddle AgedMyocardial InfarctionPatient SelectionPeripheral Vascular DiseasesRisk AssessmentHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsHypolipidemic Agents

Identifiers

PMID12630980
PMCPMC1884220

What OpenQuestion holds

Texttitle and abstract
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.