ArticleJournal of muscle research and cell motility2002
Separation of detubulation and vacuolation phenomena in amphibian skeletal muscle.
Article in Journal of muscle research and cell motility, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sartorius muscle fibres from cold-adapted Rana temporaria were exposed to variants of an established detubulation procedure (Koutsis et al. (1995) J Muscle Res Cell Motil 16, 519-528) to test the extent to which detubulation and tubular vacuolation phenomena could be separated using different conditions of osmotic shock. A control procedure was optimised to a 28-min exposure to 400 mM glycerol-Ringer. This was followed by a recovery step involving its replacement by a Ca2+/Mg(2+)-Ringer solution and steady cooling over 30 min from room temperature (approximately 18 degress C) to approximately 10 degress C, followed by the restoration of the normal Ringer solution. This procedure successfully abolished the action potential after-depolarisation component, reflecting a loss of tubular conduction ('detubulation') in 74.3 +/- 5.9% of the fibres studied. Omitting the cooling during the recovery step sharply reduced the incidence of detubulation. So did omitting either the high-[Ca2+] and/or [Mg2+] in the recovery solutions in test procedures, but to significantly different extents (P < 5%). Yet trapping of fluorescent Sulfhorhodamine B dye in 'closed' vacuoles persisted albeit with reduced proportions of fibre volume occupied by vacuoles. Furthermore, the variations in recovery conditions produced similar levels of vacuolation despite smaller vacuole sizes in the cooled fibres (P < 0.05). These findings demonstrate that fibre vacuolation and detubulation are phenomena that are potentially separable through varying the conditions of osmotic shock, with detubulation requiring significantly more stringent conditions than vacuolation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.