Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12626764›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2003

Computational and experimental analysis of DNA shuffling.

Narendra Maheshri, David V Schaffer

Abstract readComparative StudyValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Generation of Cry11 Variants ofEvolutionary bioinformatics online · 2020
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Narendra MaheshriDepartment of Chemical Engineering and Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720-1462, USA.
David V Schaffer

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We describe a computational model of DNA shuffling based on the thermodynamics and kinetics of this process. The model independently tracks a representative ensemble of DNA molecules and records their states at every stage of a shuffling reaction. These data can subsequently be analyzed to yield information on any relevant metric, including reassembly efficiency, crossover number, type and distribution, and DNA sequence length distributions. The predictive ability of the model was validated by comparison to three independent sets of experimental data, and analysis of the simulation results led to several unique insights into the DNA shuffling process. We examine a tradeoff between crossover frequency and reassembly efficiency and illustrate the effects of experimental parameters on this relationship. Furthermore, we discuss conditions that promote the formation of useless "junk" DNA sequences or multimeric sequences containing multiple copies of the reassembled product. This model will therefore aid in the design of optimal shuffling reaction conditions.

Indexed as

DioxygenasesDNA ShufflingIron-Sulfur ProteinsBase SequenceDirected Molecular EvolutionDNADNA, IntergenicDNA PrimersGreen Fluorescent ProteinsLuminescent ProteinsModels, GeneticNucleic Acid HybridizationOxygenasesPolymerase Chain ReactionSubtilisinsThermodynamicsbiphenyl-2,3-dioxygenasechlorobenzene dioxygenaseDioxygenasesDNADNA, IntergenicDNA PrimersGreen Fluorescent ProteinsIron-Sulfur ProteinsLuminescent ProteinsOxygenasesSubtilisinstoluene dioxygenase

Identifiers

PMID12626764
PMCPMC152248

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.