Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12626685›Full record

ReviewMicrobiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR2003

Bacteriophage T4 genome.

Eric S Miller, Elizabeth Kutter, Gisela Mosig, Fumio Arisaka, Takashi Kunisawa, Wolfgang Rüger

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 458 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
458citing papers in PubMed
28.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

458 citing papers in PubMed, 825 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. How bacterial immune systems sense phage infection.Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Towards modeling phage therapy.PLoS computational biology · 2026
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. A methylome-derived mbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article

398 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Eric S MillerDepartment of Microbiology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina 27695-7615, USA. eric_miller@ncsu.edu
Elizabeth Kutter
Gisela Mosig
Fumio Arisaka
Takashi Kunisawa
Wolfgang Rüger
North Carolina State University · USRuhr University Bochum · DEThe Evergreen State College · USTokyo Institute of Technology · JPTokyo University of Science · JPVanderbilt University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Phage T4 has provided countless contributions to the paradigms of genetics and biochemistry. Its complete genome sequence of 168,903 bp encodes about 300 gene products. T4 biology and its genomic sequence provide the best-understood model for modern functional genomics and proteomics. Variations on gene expression, including overlapping genes, internal translation initiation, spliced genes, translational bypassing, and RNA processing, alert us to the caveats of purely computational methods. The T4 transcriptional pattern reflects its dependence on the host RNA polymerase and the use of phage-encoded proteins that sequentially modify RNA polymerase; transcriptional activator proteins, a phage sigma factor, anti-sigma, and sigma decoy proteins also act to specify early, middle, and late promoter recognition. Posttranscriptional controls by T4 provide excellent systems for the study of RNA-dependent processes, particularly at the structural level. The redundancy of DNA replication and recombination systems of T4 reveals how phage and other genomes are stably replicated and repaired in different environments, providing insight into genome evolution and adaptations to new hosts and growth environments. Moreover, genomic sequence analysis has provided new insights into tail fiber variation, lysis, gene duplications, and membrane localization of proteins, while high-resolution structural determination of the "cell-puncturing device," combined with the three-dimensional image reconstruction of the baseplate, has revealed the mechanism of penetration during infection. Despite these advances, nearly 130 potential T4 genes remain uncharacterized. Current phage-sequencing initiatives are now revealing the similarities and differences among members of the T4 family, including those that infect bacteria other than Escherichia coli. T4 functional genomics will aid in the interpretation of these newly sequenced T4-related genomes and in broadening our understanding of the complex evolution and ecology of phages-the most abundant and among the most ancient biological entities on Earth.

Indexed as

Genome, ViralPromoter Regions, GeneticProtein BiosynthesisTranscription, GeneticBacteriophage T4DNA RepairDNA ReplicationDNA, ViralLysogenyModels, MolecularOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisRibosomesRNA, ViralDNA, ViralRNA, Viral

Identifiers

PMID12626685
PMCPMC150520
OpenAlexW2160521062

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.