Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12624030›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2003

Comparison of broth microdilution, E Test, and agar dilution methods for antibiotic susceptibility testing of Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli.

Petra Luber, Edda Bartelt, Elke Genschow, Jutta Wagner, Helmut Hahn

Abstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. RETRACTED:Pharmaceutics · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Properties ofGlobal pediatric health · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. A Guide to Bacterial Culture Identification And Results Interpretation.P & T : a peer-reviewed journal for formulary management · 2019
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Petra LuberDivision of Food Hygiene, Federal Institute for Risk Assessment, D-12277 Berlin, Germany. p.luber@bfr.bund.de
Edda Bartelt
Elke Genschow
Jutta Wagner
Helmut Hahn

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A standardized broth microdilution method was compared to the E test and an agar dilution method for the antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Campylobacter jejuni and C. coli isolates. A group of 47 human clinical isolates, 37 isolates from retail poultry, and 29 isolates from living turkeys (total, 113 isolates) was included in the study. These encompassed 92 C. jejuni and 21 C. coli strains. The MICs of six antimicrobial agents were determined by the broth microdilution and E test methods, and the strains of human origin were additionally tested by the agar dilution method. In general, broth microdilution MICs agreed within 1 log(2) MIC increment with 90.0% of E test results and 78.7% of agar dilution test results. The agar dilution method gave much lower gentamicin MICs than the broth microdilution method, but the data were significantly (P < 0.01) correlated and there was 100% agreement in the sensitivities and specificities in the comparison of the tests. The broth microdilution method had the highest sensitivity for analysis of the susceptibilities of Campylobacter to nalidixic acid and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. The MICs of ciprofloxacin and erythromycin complied numerically by all three methods. The classification of the results and the correlation of the data demonstrated a high degree of agreement. All methods were equally suitable for the testing of the sensitivity of Campylobacter to tetracycline. Thus, the broth microdilution method appears to be an easy and reliable method for determination of the MICs of antibiotics for C. jejuni and C. coli, and it may offer an interesting alternative to MIC determination by the agar dilution technique or the E test.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsBacteriological TechniquesCampylobacter coliCampylobacter jejuniCiprofloxacinErythromycinGentamicinsHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsNalidixic AcidTetracyclineTrimethoprim, Sulfamethoxazole Drug CombinationAnti-Bacterial AgentsCiprofloxacinErythromycinGentamicinsNalidixic AcidTetracyclineTrimethoprim, Sulfamethoxazole Drug Combination

Identifiers

PMID12624030
PMCPMC150256

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.