ArticleAtencion primaria2003
[Detection of cardiovascular risk factors in the reformed primary care network in Catalonia. Comparison between the years 1995 and 2000].
Article in Atencion primaria, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.
- Vascular Risk Factors in Ischemic Stroke Survivors: A Retrospective Study in Catalonia, Spain.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Variability in screening prevention activities in primary care in Spain: a multilevel analysis.BMC public health · 2015Article
- [Is the action taken by Catalonian primary care doctors adequate in view of the insufficient reduction in blood pressure levels in hypertensive patients? DISEHTAC-2001 study].Atencion primaria · 2008Article
- Variability in the performance of preventive services and in the degree of control of identified health problems: a primary care study protocol.BMC public health · 2008Article
- [Control of vascular risk factors before and after an AMI or a CVA].Atencion primaria · 2007Article
- [Detection and handling of alcohol problems in primary care in Catalonia].Atencion primaria · 2006Article
- [Study of unmatched cases and controls: hyperhomocysteinaemia and chronic ischaemic cardiopathy].Atencion primaria · 2006Article
- [Consensus on a process of benchmarking in primary care in Barcelona].Atencion primaria · 2005Article
- [The DISEHTAC II study: diagnosis and follow-up of hypertension in Catalonia. comparison with 1996 data].Atencion primaria · 2005Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo know if much the detection and control of cardiovascular risk factors (FRCV) have been incorporated in primary care settings (PCS) on 2000 and compare them with 1995 results. Design and participants. A descriptive cross-sectional study of a random sample of 5,875 of clinical histories (CH) of patients aged 15 and over attended during 2000 in PCS, which had been in operation for over three years. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN
resultsWhether were recorded values, levels, diagnoses and control related to: blood pressure, cholesterol, glucose, weight, size, tobacco and alcohol consumption, in order to compare 1995 and 2000 results obtained with the same methodology. Cholesterol levels (57.3%), blood pressure values (52.9%) and glucose levels (51.3%) are the most recorded variables in CH. Obese diabetics and high blood pressure patients are the most studied with a mean of 3.6 records in the CH related others CRF. Smoking (41.7%) and hypertension (32.9%) are the most frequents diagnoses. The 32.3% of the high blood pressure patients have optimum control and 42.9% acceptable control. The 31.2% hyperlipaemia and the 34.1% diabetic patients are controlled. Compared with 1995, the main variations observed are: an increase of the records of cholesterol levels and glucose levels and a decrease of the others, especially in tobacco and alcohol consumption screening. Diabetes and obesity diagnosis decrease and smoking and excessive alcohol consumption increase have been also observed. Screening age and sex group differences are maintained.
conclusionsThe results suggest that may be a change in CRF screening performance is happening and the influencial factors would be study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.