Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12618912›Full record

ArticleImmunogenetics2003

Prediction of the prototype of the human Toll-like receptor gene family from the pufferfish, Fugu rubripes, genome.

Hiroyuki Oshiumi, Tadayuki Tsujita, Kyoko Shida, Misako Matsumoto, Kazuho Ikeo, Tsukasa Seya

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Immunogenetics, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 59 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
59citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

59 citing papers in PubMed, 316 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Comparative Transcriptomic Immune Responses of Mullet (Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. PeerJ · 2021
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Toll-Like Receptor 5 of Golden PompanoInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hiroyuki OshiumiDepartment of Immunology, Osaka Medical Center for Cancer and Cardiovascular Diseases, Higashinari-ku, Japan.
Tadayuki Tsujita
Kyoko Shida
Misako Matsumoto
Kazuho Ikeo
Tsukasa Seya
Osaka Medical Center for Cancer and Cardiovascular Diseases · JPNational Institute of Genetics · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The insect Toll family of proteins and their mammalian counterparts seemingly shared one common ancestor and evolved independently. Here we demonstrated that the prototype of the mammalian-type (M-type) Toll family is shared by the fish and humans. According to the draft of the pufferfish Fugu genome project, the signature Toll-IL-1 receptor homology domain (TIR domain) has been conserved during evolution. FuguTLR2, 3, 5, 7, 8 and 9 members correspond structurally to respective mammalian TLRs. One Fugu TLR showed equally high amino acid identity to human TLR1, 6 and 10, and we named it FuguTLR1. Fugu rubripes has genes for TLR21 and 22, which are unique to fish. One possible interpretation of these findings is that TLR1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 21 and 22 existed in the ancestral genome common to fish and mammals, and that TLR4 was lost in the fish lineage, while TLR21 and 22 were lost in the mammalian lineage. Strikingly, a solitary ascidian, Halocynthia roretzi, has only a few Toll-like proteins, which, like Caenorhabditis elegans Toll, represent primitive ones before the expansion of the Toll family. Therefore, the expansion of TLR genes should have occurred earlier than fish, but not C. intestinalis, separated evolutionarily from mammals. These results infer that the appearance of the M-type innate system was completed before or concomitant with the appearance of acquired immunity. We interpret the present data to mean that the differences of TLRs identified in this study between fishes and humans may be rather peripheral, partially due to selection pressure exerted by pathogens in distinct environments.

Indexed as

Drosophila ProteinsAmino Acid SequenceAnimalsBase SequenceDNAEvolution, MolecularGene ExpressionHumansMembrane GlycoproteinsMolecular Sequence DataMultigene FamilyPhylogenyProtein Structure, TertiaryReceptors, Cell SurfaceRNA, MessengerSequence Homology, Amino AcidDNADrosophila ProteinsMembrane GlycoproteinsReceptors, Cell SurfaceRNA, MessengerTLR4 protein, humanToll-Like Receptor 1Toll-Like Receptor 4Toll-Like Receptors

Identifiers

PMID12618912
OpenAlexW2112176050

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.