ArticleGenetics2003
Evidence of a high rate of selective sweeps in African Drosophila melanogaster.
Article in Genetics, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Admixture has obscured signals of historical hard sweeps in humans.Nature ecology & evolution · 2022Article
- Article
- Local patterns of nucleotide polymorphism are highly variable in the selfing species Arabidopsis thaliana.Journal of molecular evolution · 2008Article
- Article
- Multilocus patterns of nucleotide variability and the demographic and selection history of Drosophila melanogaster populations.Genome research · 2005Article
- Chromosomal inversion polymorphism leads to extensive genetic structure: a multilocus survey in Drosophila subobscura.Genetics · 2005Article
- Polymorphix: a sequence polymorphism database.Nucleic acids research · 2005Article
- Signature of selective sweep associated with the evolution of sex-ratio drive in Drosophila simulans.Genetics · 2004Article
- Molecular population genetics of the beta-esterase gene cluster of Drosophila melanogaster.Journal of genetics · 2003Article
- Nucleotide variation of the Est-6 gene region in natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster.Genetics · 2003Article
- Demography and natural selection have shaped genetic variation in Drosophila melanogaster: a multi-locus approach.Genetics · 2003Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Assessing the rate of evolution depends on our ability to detect selection at several genes simultaneously. We summarize DNA sequence variation data in three new and six previously published data sets from the left arm of the second chromosome of Drosophila melanogaster in a population from West Africa, the presumed area of origin of this species. Four loci [Acp26Aa, Fbp2, Vha68-1, and Su(H)] were previously found to deviate from a neutral mutation-drift equilibrium as a consequence of one or several selective sweeps. Polymorphism data from five loci from intervening regions (dpp, Acp26Ab, Acp29AB, GH10711, and Sos) did not show the characteristic deviation from neutrality caused by local selective sweeps. This genomic region is polymorphic for the In(2L)t inversion. Four loci located near inversion breakpoints [dpp, sos, GH10711, and Su(H)] showed significant structuring between the two arrangements or significant deviation from neutrality in the inverted class, probably as a result of a recent shift in inversion frequency. Overall, these patterns of variation suggest that the four selective events were independent. Six loci were observed with no a priori knowledge of selection, and independent selective sweeps were detected in three of them. This suggests that a large part of the D. melanogaster genome has experienced the effect of positive selection in its ancestral African range.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.