Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12618375›Full record

ArticleGenome research2003

Gene discovery in the apicomplexa as revealed by EST sequencing and assembly of a comparative gene database.

Li Li, Brian P Brunk, Jessica C Kissinger, Deana Pape, Keliang Tang, Robert H Cole, John Martin, Todd Wylie, Mike Dante, Steven J Fogarty and 13 more

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Genome research, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Genetic diversity of Toxoplasma gondii in animals and humans.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2009
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors.

Li LiDepartment of Biology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, USA.
Brian P Brunk
Jessica C Kissinger
Deana Pape
Keliang Tang
Robert H Cole
John Martin
Todd Wylie
Mike Dante
Steven J Fogarty
Daniel K Howe
Paul Liberator
Carmen Diaz
Jennifer Anderson
Michael White
Maria E Jerome
Emily A Johnson
Jay A Radke
Christian J Stoeckert
Robert H Waterston
Sandra W Clifton
David S Roos
L David Sibley

Funding

MOLECULAR BASIS OF TOXOPLASMOSIS IN AIDS PATIENTSR01AI036629 · NIAID · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI SIBLEY, L. DAVID · 1994 to 2013
$5.3M
GENE DISCOVERY IN TOXOPLASMA GONDIIR01AI045806 · NIAID · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI SIBLEY, L DAVID · 2000 to 2003
$1.6M
GENE DISCOVERY IN TOXOPLASMA GONDIIR21AI045806 · NIAID · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI SIBLEY, L DAVID · 1999 to 1999
–
NIAID NIH HHS AI45806NIAID NIH HHS AI45806A1NIAID NIH HHS AI48121NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI036629NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI045806NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI045806
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Large-scale EST sequencing projects for several important parasites within the phylum Apicomplexa were undertaken for the purpose of gene discovery. Included were several parasites of medical importance (Plasmodium falciparum, Toxoplasma gondii) and others of veterinary importance (Eimeria tenella, Sarcocystis neurona, and Neospora caninum). A total of 55192 ESTs, deposited into dbEST/GenBank, were included in the analyses. The resulting sequences have been clustered into nonredundant gene assemblies and deposited into a relational database that supports a variety of sequence and text searches. This database has been used to compare the gene assemblies using BLAST similarity comparisons to the public protein databases to identify putative genes. Of these new entries, approximately 15%-20% represent putative homologs with a conservative cutoff of p < 10(-9), thus identifying many conserved genes that are likely to share common functions with other well-studied organisms. Gene assemblies were also used to identify strain polymorphisms, examine stage-specific expression, and identify gene families. An interesting class of genes that are confined to members of this phylum and not shared by plants, animals, or fungi, was identified. These genes likely mediate the novel biological features of members of the Apicomplexa and hence offer great potential for biological investigation and as possible therapeutic targets.

Indexed as

Databases, GeneticExpressed Sequence TagsAnimalsApicomplexaBase SequenceCloning, MolecularContig MappingDNA, ProtozoanEimeria tenellaGene DosageGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalGenes, ProtozoanMolecular Sequence DataNeosporaPhylogenyDNA, Protozoan

Identifiers

PMID12618375
PMCPMC430278

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.