Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12618370›Full record

ArticleGenome research2003

Schizosaccharomyces pombe essential genes: a pilot study.

Anabelle Decottignies, Isabel Sanchez-Perez, Paul Nurse

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Genome research, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 73 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Testing the Domino Theory of Gene Loss inLife (Basel, Switzerland) · 2018
    Article
  6. F1000Research · 2016
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Cholesterol as a co-solvent and a ligand for membrane proteins.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2014
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. S. pombe genome deletion project: an update.Cell cycle (Georgetown, Tex.) · 2010
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Significant conservation of synthetic lethal genetic interaction networks between distantly related eukaryotes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2008
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Anabelle DecottigniesCell Cycle Laboratory, Cancer Research UK, London, WC2A 3PX, UK. decottignies@gece.ucl.ac.be
Isabel Sanchez-Perez
Paul Nurse
Cancer Research UK · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

After completion of the Schizosaccharomyces pombe genome sequence, we have carried out a pilot gene deletion project to assess the feasibility of a genome-wide deletion project and to estimate the percentage of essential genes. Using a PCR-based gene deletion procedure, we investigated 100 genes within a 253-kb region of chromosome II. Eight of nine genes located within a region of 18 kb could not be deleted, suggesting that systematic deletion of all fission yeast genes may be difficult to achieve using this PCR approach. The percentage of essential genes was found to be 17.5%. Further deletion of selected S. pombe genes revealed that whether a gene is essential or not is correlated with the timing of its appearance on the tree of life and its conservation within all branches of the tree. None of the investigated ancient genes in fission yeast that have been lost in the Saccharomyces cerevisiae lineage are essential. In agreement with S. cerevisiae and Caenorhabditis elegans genome analyses, our data suggest that natural selection has preferentially kept the genes required for vital functions. We propose that many of the essential eukaryotic genes appeared with the first eukaryotic cell and have remained conserved in all species.

Indexed as

Amino Acid SequenceChromosome DeletionDatabases, ProteinEvolution, MolecularGene Expression Regulation, FungalGenes, EssentialGenes, FungalGenes, LethalPilot ProjectsSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsSchizosaccharomycesSchizosaccharomyces pombe ProteinsSequence Homology, Nucleic AcidSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsSchizosaccharomyces pombe Proteins

Identifiers

PMID12618370
PMCPMC430286
OpenAlexW2101188022

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.