Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12618366›Full record

ArticleGenome research2003

Analysis of primate genomic variation reveals a repeat-driven expansion of the human genome.

Ge Liu, NISC Comparative Sequencing Program, Shaying Zhao, Jeffrey A Bailey, S Cenk Sahinalp, Can Alkan, Eray Tuzun, Eric D Green, Evan E Eichler

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative StudyValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Genome research, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 63 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
63citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

63 citing papers in PubMed, 144 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Sequencing and Characterization of αs2-Casein Gene (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Rates and patterns of great ape retrotransposition.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2013
    Article
  18. Mammalian NUMT insertion is non-random.Nucleic acids research · 2012
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

3 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ge LiuDepartment of Genetics, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine and University Hospitals of Cleveland, Cleveland, Ohio 44106, USA.
NISC Comparative Sequencing Program
Shaying Zhao
Jeffrey A Bailey
S Cenk Sahinalp
Can Alkan
Eray Tuzun
Eric D Green
Evan E Eichler
University Hospitals of Cleveland · US

Funding

MEDICAL SCIENTIST TRAINING PROGRAMT32GM007250 · NIGMS · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI HUANG, ALEX YEE-CHEN · 1985 to 2023
$33.4M
MECHANISM &INSTABILITY OF PERICENTROMERIC DUPLICATIONSR01GM058815 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI EICHLER, EVAN · 1999 to 2010
$2.9M
Process &Outcomes of BRCAL/2 clinical testingR01HG002318 · NHGRI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE · PI GARBER, JUDY ELLEN · 2001 to 2003
$1.2M
TRAINING IN HUMAN AND MEDICAL GENETICST32HD007518 · NICHD · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI HASSOLD, TERRY J · 1998 to 2002
$748k
NCI NIH HHS CA094816NHGRI NIH HHS HG002318NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG002318NICHD NIH HHS HD-07518-05NICHD NIH HHS T32 HD007518NIGMS NIH HHS GM58815NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM058815NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007250
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We performed a detailed analysis of both single-nucleotide and large insertion/deletion events based on large-scale comparison of 10.6 Mb of genomic sequence from lemur, baboon, and chimpanzee to human. Using a human genomic reference, optimal global alignments were constructed from large (>50-kb) genomic sequence clones. These alignments were examined for the pattern, frequency, and nature of mutational events. Whereas rates of single-nucleotide substitution remain relatively constant (1-2 x 10(-9) substitutions/site/year), rates of retrotransposition vary radically among different primate lineages. These differences have lead to a 15%-20% expansion of human genome size over the last 50 million years of primate evolution, 90% of it due to new retroposon insertions. Orthologous comparisons with the chimpanzee suggest that the human genome continues to significantly expand due to shifts in retrotransposition activity. Assuming that the primate genome sequence we have sampled is representative, we estimate that human euchromatin has expanded 30 Mb and 550 Mb compared to the primate genomes of chimpanzee and lemur, respectively.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularGenomeGenome, HumanAnimalsGenetic VariationHumansLemurPapioPoint MutationPongo pygmaeusPrimatesRetroelementsSequence AlignmentRetroelements

Identifiers

PMID12618366
PMCPMC430288
OpenAlexW2113324240

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.