Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12615747›Full record

Trial reportCMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne2003

The striking effect of the Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation (HOPE) on ramipril prescribing in Ontario.

Karen Tu, Muhammad M Mamdani, Robert M Jacka, Natalie J Forde, Deanna M Rothwell, Jack V Tu

Open access · greenAbstract readClinical TrialMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Impact of drug policy on regional trends in ezetimibe use.Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes · 2014
    Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Impact of high dose statin trials on hospital prescribers.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2007
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. More than just hype.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2003
    Article
  12. More than just hype.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2003
    Article
  13. Ramipril use in Canada: HOPE or HYPE?CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2003
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Karen TuInstitute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, University Health Network-Toronto Western Hospital Family Medicine Center and Department of Family and Community Health-Family Health Research Unit, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON. karen@ices.on.ca
Muhammad M Mamdani
Robert M Jacka
Natalie J Forde
Deanna M Rothwell
Jack V Tu
Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation (HOPE), a Canadian-led, multicentre, randomized controlled trial, demonstrated the effectiveness of the ACE inhibitor ramipril in the secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease in patients who were at high risk for cardiovascular events but did not have left ventricular dysfunction or heart failure. We studied whether HOPE affected the prescribing of ACE inhibitors generally, and ramipril specifically, in Ontario, where the trial was coordinated.

methodsWe used linked administrative databases to examine prescribing patterns for ACE inhibitors in the 1.29 million to 1.54 million elderly (aged 66 and over) residents of Ontario during the study period and specifically those with diabetes or congestive heart failure. For all new prescriptions for these drugs filled between Jan. 1, 1993, and Mar. 31, 2001, we conducted time-series analyses to measure any association with the release of the HOPE results.

resultsThe monthly number of new prescriptions for ramipril from the time it was introduced in 1995 until HOPE's early termination, in April 1999, peaked at 58 per 100,000 elderly Ontario residents. The rate increased to 92/100,000 in May, coincident with newspaper coverage of the trial's early termination, then fell back to 63/100,000 in August. After HOPE's results were formally released, starting Aug. 31, the rate increased significantly; it peaked at 304/100,000 in May 2000 (p < 0.01). The market share of ramipril among ACE inhibitors also increased significantly (p < 0.01), both overall and among patients with diabetes or congestive heart failure.

interpretationHOPE led to a striking and unprecedented increase, over 400%, in ramipril prescribing to elderly Ontario residents, including those not eligible for the trial. Many physicians are now prescribing ramipril for patients with diabetes or congestive heart failure.

Indexed as

AgedAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme InhibitorsCardiovascular DiseasesDatabases, FactualDrug UtilizationHumansOntarioRamiprilTreatment OutcomeAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme InhibitorsRamipril

Identifiers

PMID12615747
PMCPMC149247
OpenAlexW2160308837

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.