ArticleBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2003
Achieving national service framework standards for cardiac rehabilitation and secondary prevention.
Article in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 89 citations in OpenAlex.
- Implementation of Telerehabilitation Interventions for the Self-Management of Cardiovascular Disease: Systematic Review.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2020Pooled it
- Home based versus centre based cardiac rehabilitation: Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2010Pooled it
- A psychological approach to providing self-management education for people with type 2 diabetes: the Diabetes Manual.BMC family practice · 2006Trial
- Article
- Adherence to self-care behavior and glycemic effects using structured education.Journal of diabetes investigation · 2015Article
- Cardiac rehabilitation.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2015Review
- Article
- Geographic issues in cardiac rehabilitation utilization: a narrative review.Health & place · 2010Article
- Cardiac rehabilitation uptake following myocardial infarction: cross-sectional study in primary care.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2010Article
- Cardiac rehabilitation: it works so why isn't it done?The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2008Article
- What about the GPs? We help treat acute coronary syndromes.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2007Article
- The Diabetes Manual trial protocol - a cluster randomized controlled trial of a self-management intervention for type 2 diabetes [ISRCTN06315411].BMC family practice · 2006Article
- Recent developments in secondary prevention and cardiac rehabilitation after acute myocardial infarction.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2004Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
problemIntegrated care for patients who survive a myocardial infarction is lacking. Many patients are not offered cardiac rehabilitation, and secondary prevention is not optimal.
design12 month audit of 106 patients who survived an acute myocardial infarction. BACKGROUND AND
settingCarrick Primary Care Trust in Cornwall (population 98 500) and one district general hospital. KEY MEASURES FOR IMPROVEMENT: Proportion of patients who complete a cardiac rehabilitation programme after a myocardial infarction. Proportion of patients with optimal secondary prevention, as measured by smoking status, body mass index, cholesterol <5.0 mmol/l, and blood pressure <140/85 mm Hg. STRATEGIES FOR CHANGE: We set up a novel, integrated, and seamless system for cardiac rehabilitation. We employed a cardiac liaison nurse to identify and assess in hospital all patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction. The nurse offered patients the choice of home based rehabilitation with the Heart Manual or hospital based rehabilitation. The nurse gave discharge details to the patient's general practice; these were to be included on a practice based register of coronary heart disease. EFFECTS OF CHANGE: All 106 eligible patients were offered cardiac rehabilitation and were included in a practice based register of coronary heart disease to facilitate long term follow up in primary care. 47 (44%) patients chose home based rehabilitation with the Heart Manual, and 41 (87%) of these completed the programme; 35 (33%) patients chose hospital based rehabilitation, and 17 (49%) of these completed the programme. The numbers of patients achieving secondary prevention targets improved significantly: those with serum cholesterol <5.0 mmol/l at discharge increased from 28% at baseline to 75% at 12 months. Optimal care (at least 80-90% uptake of an intervention) was seen with antiplatelet and statin treatments and with smoking cessation. Significantly more patients were prescribed statins at follow up than at baseline (77/106 v 80/91, P=0.005). LESSONS LEARNT: National service framework targets for cardiac rehabilitation and secondary prevention can be achieved in patients who survive a myocardial infarction by integrating rehabilitation services (home and hospital) with secondary prevention clinics in primary care. Nurse led clinics in primary care facilitate long term structured care and optimal secondary prevention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.