Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12609905›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2003

Statistical analysis of fluorescence correlation spectroscopy: the standard deviation and bias.

Saveez Saffarian, Elliot L Elson

Abstract readEvaluation StudyValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Fluorescence Correlation Spectroscopy and Phase Separation.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. The Human CytochromeBiochemistry · 2020
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Saveez SaffarianDepartment of Physics, Washington University, St Louis, Missouri 63110, USA.
Elliot L Elson

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We present a detailed statistical analysis of fluorescence correlation spectroscopy for a wide range of timescales. The derivation is completely analytical and can provide an excellent tool for planning and analysis of FCS experiments. The dependence of the signal-to-noise ratio on different measurement conditions is extensively studied. We find that in addition to the shot noise and the noise associated with correlated molecular dynamics there is another source of noise that appears at very large lag times. We call this the "particle noise," as its behavior is governed by the number of particles that have entered and left the laser beam sample volume during large dwell times. The standard deviations of all the points on the correlation function are calculated analytically and shown to be in good agreement with experiments. We have also investigated the bias associated with experimental correlation function measurements. A "phase diagram" for FCS experiments is constructed that demonstrates the significance of the bias for any given experiment. We demonstrate that the value of the bias can be calculated and added back as a first-order correction to the experimental correlation function.

Indexed as

Models, StatisticalMotionStochastic ProcessesArtifactsComputer SimulationDextransDiffusionEquipment Failure AnalysisReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificitySpectrometry, FluorescenceStatistics as TopicDextrans

Identifiers

PMID12609905
PMCPMC1302772

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.