Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12604518›Full record

Trial reportAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2003

Cefpodoxime-proxetil versus trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole for short-term therapy of uncomplicated acute cystitis in women.

Demetra Kavatha, Helen Giamarellou, Zoe Alexiou, Nickolas Vlachogiannis, Stavroula Pentea, Thomas Gozadinos, Garyphalia Poulakou, Agissilaos Hatzipapas, George Koratzanis

Open access · greenAbstract readClinical TrialComparative StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 68 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Comparison of oral third- versus first-/ second-generation cephalosporins for acute uncomplicated cystitis: a nationwide retrospective cohort study.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Sulfonamide Allergies.Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Antimicrobial Stewardship and Urinary Tract Infections.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2014
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Demetra Kavatha1st Department of Propedeutic Medicine,Laiko General Hospital, Athens, Greece.
Helen Giamarellou
Zoe Alexiou
Nickolas Vlachogiannis
Stavroula Pentea
Thomas Gozadinos
Garyphalia Poulakou
Agissilaos Hatzipapas
George Koratzanis
Laiko General Hospital of Athens · GRSismanoglio General Hospital · GR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One hundred sixty-three women with uncomplicated acute lower urinary tract infections were included in a multicenter randomized study comparing cefpodoxime-proxetil (one 100-mg tablet twice daily) with trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (one double-strength tablet [160/800 mg] twice daily) for 3 days. A total of 30 women in both arms were excluded from the study for various reasons. At 4 to 7 days after the discontinuation of therapy, 62 of 63 (98.4%) cefpodoxime-proxetil recipients and 70 of 70 (100%) trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole patients were clinically cured and demonstrated bacteriological eradication, respectively. At 28 days after treatment, 48 of 55 (87.3%) and 43 of 50 (86%) cefpodoxime-proxetil recipients as well as 51 of 60 (85%) and 42 of 50 (84%) trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole recipients were clinically cured and demonstrated bacteriological eradication, respectively. Independently of the prescribed regimen, a significant difference (P < 0.001) in failure rates was observed only for patients with a previous history of three or more episodes of acute cystitis per year. With the exception of one patient in the trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole arm who discontinued therapy because of gastrointestinal pain, both antimicrobials were well tolerated. In conclusion, cefpodoxime-proxetil treatment for 3 days was as safe and effective as trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole for 3 days for the treatment of uncomplicated acute cystitis in women.

Indexed as

Acute DiseaseAdolescentAdultAgedAnti-Bacterial AgentsCefpodoxime ProxetilCeftizoximeCystitisDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMiddle AgedProspective StudiesTreatment OutcomeTrimethoprim, Sulfamethoxazole Drug CombinationAnti-Bacterial AgentsCefpodoxime ProxetilCeftizoximeTrimethoprim, Sulfamethoxazole Drug Combination

Identifiers

PMID12604518
PMCPMC149311
OpenAlexW1996192073

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.