Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12603629›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2003

Redesigning mental health services: lessons on user involvement from the Mental Health Collaborative.

Glenn Robert, Jeanne Hardacre, Louise Locock, Paul Bate, Jon Glasby

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Consumer input into health care: Time for a new active and comprehensive model of consumer involvement.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2018
    Review
  5. Whose voices? Patient and public involvement in clinical commissioning.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2017
    Article
  6. Participation in mental healthcare: a qualitative meta-synthesis.International journal of mental health systems · 2017
    Review
  7. Mutual powerlessness in client participation practices in mental health care.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2014
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Involving mental health service users in quality assurance.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2006
    Article
  10. From rhetoric to reality: including patient voices in supportive cancer care planning.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2005
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Glenn RobertCentre for Health Informatics and Multiprofessional Education, University College London, UK. g.robert@chime.ucl.ac.uk
Jeanne Hardacre
Louise Locock
Paul Bate
Jon Glasby

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo explore the involvement of mental health service users in the redesign of in-patient mental health services in six Trusts participating in a multi-regional NHS modernization programme.

designSemi-structured interviews and observation of team meetings undertaken as part of an action research study. PARTICIPANTS AND

settingUsers, clinical, medical and managerial staff from six mental health trusts which participated in the Northern & Yorkshire and Trent regions' Mental Health Collaborative (MHC). RESULTS AND

conclusionsWhilst there were some problems, user involvement was undoubtedly a strength of the MHC in comparison to other modernization programmes within the NHS we have studied. However, the particular challenges posed by the specific context of acute mental health services should not be overlooked. The initial approach taken in each of the sites was to simply invite a user or user representative to join the local project team. In the course of events, various changes were made to this initial mechanism for involving users in the ongoing work of the teams. These changes--and setbacks in some sites--make drawing firm conclusions as to the effectiveness of the various strategies employed problematic. However, our qualitative data suggest a number of broad lessons that will assist both those leading and participating in other redesign initiatives to maximize the benefits to be gained from service user involvement.

Indexed as

Community ParticipationHospital RestructuringCooperative BehaviorHealth Services ResearchHospitals, PsychiatricHumansMental Health ServicesOrganizational InnovationQualitative ResearchState MedicineSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID12603629
PMCPMC5060162

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.