Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12603625›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2003

Barriers to patient information provision in primary care: patients' and general practitioners' experiences and expectations of information for low back pain.

Aileen McIntosh, Clare F M Shaw

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01398696 (Impact of Four Patient Information Leaflets), which is not on this map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01398696 phase4completednot on this mapstarted 2009, after this paper: background citation

Impact of Four Patient Information Leaflets (PIL) on Patient Behaviour : a Randomised Controlled Trial in Primary Care.

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Hospital, GrenobleRan2009 to 2011Enrolled400ConditionsGastroenteritis, PharyngitisArmsPatient Information Leaflets, usual consultation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Exploring patients' lived experience on the barriers to accessing low back pain health services.African journal of primary health care & family medicine · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. The Provision of Patient Information about Nystagmus.The British and Irish orthoptic journal · 2018
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Conflicting health information: a critical research need.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Aileen McIntoshPublic Health, School of Health and Related Research, Sheffield, UK. a.mcintosh@sheffield.ac.uk
Clare F M Shaw

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAs patient involvement in health-care increases, the role of information is crucial, especially in conditions where self-management is considered an integral part of care. However, the suitability and applicability of much patient information has not been appraised in terms of how far it meets patients' information needs.

aimsTo ascertain patients' and clinicians' experiences and expectations of information in low back pain in order to suggest a suitable 'patient-centred' content for a patient information pack to be used in a primary care setting.

methodsA qualitative study using semi-structured interviews with General Practitioners (GPs) (n = 15) and focus groups comprising patients with low back pain (n = 37).

resultsBarriers to information-giving for low back pain in primary care exist. Patients are dissatisfied with the information they receive from their GPs, especially regarding diagnosis and treatment. Patients tend to access information from a variety of other sources, which is often contradictory, conflicts with research evidence and leads to unreasonable expectations. GPs have varying views regarding the value of patient information and are equivocal about their roles as information providers. Although The Back Book is generally acceptable as a patient information leaflet for low back pain, attention to the tone of the text is required.

conclusionsBarriers exist to patient information provision, both generally and for low back pain, which need to be addressed in order to close the gap between strategy and implementation. Improving clinician communication skills and involving patients in developing information materials which meet their needs are crucial to this process.

Indexed as

Communication BarriersLow Back PainPhysician-Patient RelationsAttitude of Health PersonnelFocus GroupsHealth Services ResearchHumansPatient-Centered CarePatient Education as TopicPatient SatisfactionPrimary Health CareQuality Assurance, Health CareSelf CareUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID12603625
PMCPMC5060166

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.