ReviewDer Pathologe2003
[Allergy-associated colitis. Characterization of an entity and its differential diagnoses].
Review in Der Pathologe, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Allergic enteritis in children.Przeglad gastroenterologiczny · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There is substantial evidence that allergic reactions exist in the gastrointestinal tract (GI). However, patients with food allergy-related enteropathy pose a diagnostic challenge to physicians because the clinical features are variable, unspecific, occur in other gastrointestinal disorders, and specific diagnostic tools are missing. Several recent studies and reviews have focused on the function of eosinophilic granulocytes in GI disease. The role of eosinophils in the pathophysiology of GI hypersensitivity reactions is poorly defined. However, some findings have been reported that imply an involvement of eosinophils in allergic reactions of the gut. The presumptive histology of allergy-associated colitis in colonic and ileal biopsies is based on prominent pure eosinophilic infiltration of a normal lamina propria, submucosa and epithelium with variable degrees of degranulation. An immunoperoxidase stain for eosinophilic peroxidase is supportive in establishing the diagnosis if suspected. Neutrophils or mononuclear infiltrates are not significantly increased and damage to the intestinal tissue is not prominent. Despite characteristic histologic changes in colonic biopsy specimens, a final diagnosis depends on careful clinical examination and exclusion of several differential diagnoses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.