ReviewDrugs2003
Intramuscular preparations of antipsychotics: uses and relevance in clinical practice.
Review in Drugs, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 116 citations in OpenAlex.
- A meta-analysis of the risk of acute extrapyramidal symptoms with intramuscular antipsychotics for the treatment of agitation.The Journal of clinical psychiatry · 2008Pooled it
- Unveiling the Future: Opportunities in Long-Acting Injectable Drug Development for Veterinary Care.Pharmaceutics · 2025Review
- Development of a depot formulation with anFrontiers in drug delivery · 2023Article
- The Effect of Longer Dosing Intervals for Long-Acting Injectable Antipsychotics on Outcomes in Schizophrenia.Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment · 2023Review
- Comparison of prediction methods for treatment continuation of antipsychotics in children and adolescents with schizophrenia.Evidence-based mental health · 2022Article
- Alternative Routes of Administration for Therapeutic Antibodies-State of the Art.Antibodies (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Model for Long Acting Injectables (Depot Formulation) Based on Pharmacokinetics and Physical Chemical Properties.The AAPS journal · 2022Article
- Utilization of Polymeric Micelles as a Lucrative Platform for Efficient Brain Deposition of Olanzapine as an Antischizophrenic Drug via Intranasal Delivery.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Association Between Antipsychotic Treatment and Neurological Adverse Events in Pediatric Patients: A Population-Based Cohort Study in Korea.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2021Article
- Comparison of Efficacy and Safety between Long-Acting Injectable Antipsychotic Monotherapy and Combination of Long-Acting Injectable and Oral Antipsychotics in Patients with Schizophrenia.Schizophrenia research and treatment · 2021Article
- Plasma Levels of Long-Acting Injectable Antipsychotics in Outpatient Care: A Retrospective Analysis.Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment · 2021Article
- Injectable Lipid-Based Depot Formulations: Where Do We Stand?Pharmaceutics · 2020Review
- Review
- Long-Acting Injectable Second-Generation Antipsychotics: An Update and Comparison Between Agents.CNS drugs · 2018Review
- Use of combinatorial pharmacogenomic testing in two cases from community psychiatry.Pharmacogenomics and personalized medicine · 2016Article
- Efficacy, safety, and impact on hospitalizations of paliperidone palmitate in recent-onset schizophrenia.Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment · 2015Article
- Pharmacokinetics of olanzapine long-acting injection: the clinical perspective.International clinical psychopharmacology · 2014Article
- Review
- Accelerated polymer biodegradation of risperidone poly(D, L-lactide-co-glycolide) microspheres.AAPS PharmSciTech · 2012Article
- Dosing and switching strategies for paliperidone palmitate: based on population pharmacokinetic modelling and clinical trial data.CNS drugs · 2011Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intramuscular formulations of antipsychotics can be sub-divided into two groups on the basis of their pharmacokinetic features: short-acting preparations and long-acting or depot preparations. Short-acting intramuscular formulations are used to manage acute psychotic episodes. On the other hand, long-acting compounds, also called "depot", are administered as antipsychotic maintenance treatment to ensure compliance and to eliminate bioavailability problems related to absorption and first pass metabolism. Adverse effects of antipsychotics have been studied with particular respect to oral versus short- and long-acting intramuscular formulations of the different compounds. For short-term intramuscular preparations the main risk with classical compounds are hypotension and extrapyramidal side effects (EPS). Data on the incidence of EPS with depot formulations are controversial: some studies point out that the incidence of EPS is significantly higher in patients receiving depot preparations, whereas others show no difference between oral and depot antipsychotics. Studies on the strategies for switching patients from oral to depot treatment suggest that this procedure is reasonably well tolerated, so that in clinical practice depot antipsychotic therapy is usually begun while the oral treatment is still being administered, with gradual tapering of the oral dose. Efficacy, pharmacodynamics and clinical pharmacokinetics of haloperidol decanoate, fluphenazine enanthate and decanoate, clopenthixol decanoate, zuclopenthixol decanoate and acutard, flupenthixol decanoate, perphenazine enanthate, pipothiazine palmitate and undecylenate, and fluspirilene are reviewed. In addition, the intramuscular preparations of atypical antipsychotics and clinical uses are reviewed. Olanzapine and ziprasidone are available only as short-acting preparations, while risperidone is to date the only novel antipsychotic available as depot formulation. To date, acutely ill, agitated psychotic patients have been treated with high parenteral doses of typical antipsychotics, which often cause serious EPS, especially dystonic reactions. Intramuscular formulations of novel antipsychotics (olanzapine and ziprasidone), which appear to have a better tolerability profile than typical compounds, showed an equivalent efficacy to parenteral typical agents in the acute treatment of psychoses. However, parenteral or depot formulations of atypical antipsychotics are not yet widely available.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.