ArticleHuman genetics2003
FMR1 haplotype analyses among Indians: a weak founder effect and other findings.
Article in Human genetics, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Phenotypic variability of Fragile-X syndrome in Asian population: A systematic review.Intractable & rare diseases research · 2026Review
- Haplotype Analysis of DXS548 and FRAXAC1 Microsatellite Loci in Iranian Patients with Fragile X Syndrome.Iranian journal of child neurology · 2018Article
- Molecular evidence of founder effects of fatal familial insomnia through SNP haplotypes around the D178N mutation.Neurogenetics · 2008Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study on allelic/haplotypic fragile X associations evaluated using STR (DXS548, FRAXAC1, FRAXAC2) and SNP (ATL1) markers flanking the (CGG)(n) locus of FMR1is the first report from the large ethnically complex Indian population. Results have been compared with allele/haplotype distributions reported for other major ethnic groups, including White Caucasians, Africans, and Pacific Asians. Though overall allele frequency distributions at the individual loci are more similar to Western Caucasians compared with others, significant differences are observed in haplotypic associations with the mutated X. The striking findings are: (1) high diversity and heterozygosity of haplotypes among fragile X chromosomes ( n=40) and controls ( n=262), including four haplotypes found exclusively in this study sample; (2) weak association of DXS548-FRAXAC1-FRAXAC2 haplotypes, 2-1-3, 6-3-3+ and 7-4-6+ with the disorder, and absence of White Caucasian fragile X haplotypes 6-4-4 and 6-4-5; (3) weak founder effect for the fragile X expansion mutation in the Indians; (4) lack of a continuum of haplotype-based FMR1 alleles between intermediate (CGG)(n) size ranges and expanded alleles; (5) exclusion of ATL1 as a candidate genetic indicator of FMR1 instability. The high STR-based haplotype diversity observed among fragile X lineages, irrespective of ethnic alliances, strongly suggests the inappropriateness of using STR haplotypes to infer predisposition to instability among ethnically separated fragile X pedigrees and may reiterate the need for identifying newer SNPs from this region to not only determine true founder effects for the fragile X mutation, but also decipher possible mechanisms leading to CGG instability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.