Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12592608›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of human genetics2003

The genetic legacy of the Mongols.

Tatiana Zerjal, Yali Xue, Giorgio Bertorelle, R Spencer Wells, Weidong Bao, Suling Zhu, Raheel Qamar, Qasim Ayub, Aisha Mohyuddin, Songbin Fu and 13 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of human genetics, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 136 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
136citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

136 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Genomes of the Golden Horde elites and their implications for the rulers of the Mongol Empire.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Why humans evolved blue eyes.Frontiers in psychology · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Reproductive inequality in humans and other mammals.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

76 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors.

Tatiana ZerjalDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Yali Xue
Giorgio Bertorelle
R Spencer Wells
Weidong Bao
Suling Zhu
Raheel Qamar
Qasim Ayub
Aisha Mohyuddin
Songbin Fu
Pu Li
Nadira Yuldasheva
Ruslan Ruzibakiev
Jiujin Xu
Qunfang Shu
Ruofu Du
Huanming Yang
Matthew E Hurles
Elizabeth Robinson
Tudevdagva Gerelsaikhan
Bumbein Dashnyam
S Qasim Mehdi
Chris Tyler-Smith

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We have identified a Y-chromosomal lineage with several unusual features. It was found in 16 populations throughout a large region of Asia, stretching from the Pacific to the Caspian Sea, and was present at high frequency: approximately 8% of the men in this region carry it, and it thus makes up approximately 0.5% of the world total. The pattern of variation within the lineage suggested that it originated in Mongolia approximately 1,000 years ago. Such a rapid spread cannot have occurred by chance; it must have been a result of selection. The lineage is carried by likely male-line descendants of Genghis Khan, and we therefore propose that it has spread by a novel form of social selection resulting from their behavior.

Indexed as

Chromosomes, Human, YSelection, GeneticAsian PeopleChromosome MappingGeographyHaplotypesHumansMaleModels, GeneticMongoliaMutationRussiaTime

Identifiers

PMID12592608
PMCPMC1180246

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.