Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12592029›Full record

ArticleProtein science : a publication of the Protein Society2003

Hydrophobicity of transmembrane proteins: spatially profiling the distribution.

B David Silverman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Main Factors Shaping Amino Acid Usage Across Evolution.Journal of molecular evolution · 2023
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Interaction and conformational dynamics of membrane-spanning protein helices.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2009
    Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

B David SilvermanIBM Thomas J Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, New York 10598, USA. silverma@us.ibm.com

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A hallmark of soluble globular protein tertiary structure is a hydrophobic core and a protein exterior populated predominantly by hydrophilic residues. Recent hydrophobic moment profiling of the spatial distribution of 30 globular proteins of diverse size and structure had revealed features of this distribution that were comparable. Analogous profiling of the hydrophobicity distribution of the alpha-helical buried bundles of several transmembrane proteins, as the lipid/protein interface is approached from within the bilayer, reveals spatial hydrophobicity profiles that contrast with those obtained for the soluble proteins. The calculations, which enable relative changes of hydrophobicity to be simply identified over the entire spatial extent of the multimer within the lipid bilayer, show the accumulated zero-order moments of the bundles to be mainly inverted with respect to that found for the soluble proteins. This indicates a statistical increase in the average residue hydrophobic content as the lipid bilayer is approached. This result differs from that of a relatively recent calculation and qualitatively agrees with earlier calculations involving lipid exposed and buried residues of the alpha-helices of transmembrane proteins. Spatial profiling, over the entire spatial extent of the multimer with scaled values of residue hydrophobicity, provides information that is not available from calculations using lipid exposure alone.

Indexed as

Hydrophobic and Hydrophilic InteractionsModels, ChemicalAnimalsHumansLipid BilayersMembrane ProteinsModels, MolecularMolecular ConformationProtein ConformationProtein FoldingLipid BilayersMembrane Proteins

Identifiers

PMID12592029
PMCPMC2312440

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.