Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12582742›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology2003

Comparison of the sodium dodecyl sulfate-sodium hydroxide specimen processing method with the C18-carboxypropylbetaine specimen processing method using the MB/BacT liquid culture system.

J M Manterola, C G Thornton, E Padilla, J Lonca, I Corea, E Martínez, V Ausina

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Analysis of the contaminant spectrum in the MB/BacT liquid culture system following C(18)-carboxypropylbetaine specimen processing.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2003
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

J M ManterolaServicio de Microbiología, Hospital Universitario Germans Trias i Pujol, Carretera de Canyet s/n, 08916 Badalona, Spain.
C G Thornton
E Padilla
J Lonca
I Corea
E Martínez
V Ausina
Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol · ESAdvanced Technology and Research Corporation (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ability of physicians to diagnose tuberculosis is impacted by the use of smear and culture techniques combined with specimen processing methods. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of specimen processing on smear and culture sensitivity by comparing the specimen processing method that uses C(18)-carboxypropylbetaine with the method that combines sodium dodecyl sulfate and sodium hydroxide. A total of 1,201 specimens were entered into this study. Specimens were split approximately equally such that one-half of each specimen was processed with sodium dodecyl sulfate-sodium hydroxide, while the other half was processed with C(18)-carboxypropylbetaine. All sediments were subjected to acid-fast staining and then analyzed using the MB/BacT liquid culture system (bioMérieux, France) and solid media. The sensitivity of smear following processing with sodium dodecyl sulfate-sodium hydroxide and C(18)-carboxypropylbetaine was 61.2% and 58.6% (P>0.05), respectively, while the specificities were identical (99.7%). The sensitivity of culture was 84.2% and 96.1% (P<0.05), respectively. The time to detection in the MB/BacT liquid culture system was 13.2+/-5.6 and 15.0+/-8.8 days (P>0.05), respectively, and 20.0+/-7.6 and 15.7+/-8.9 days (P<0.05), respectively, on solid media. The contamination rates in the MB/BacT system were 0.8% and 8.7%, respectively, whereas the contamination rates on solid media were 2.6% and 4.3%, respectively. C(18)-carboxypropylbetaine specimen processing was less labor-intensive than sodium dodecyl sulfate-sodium hydroxide processing and improved the ability of laboratory staff to detect the presence of mycobacteria by culture.

Indexed as

Sodium Dodecyl SulfateBacteriological TechniquesBetaineChi-Square DistributionCulture Media, ConditionedFemaleHumansMaleMycobacterium tuberculosisProbabilityReagent Kits, DiagnosticSensitivity and SpecificitySodium HydroxideSpecimen HandlingTuberculosisBetaineCulture Media, ConditionedReagent Kits, DiagnosticSodium Dodecyl SulfateSodium Hydroxide

Identifiers

PMID12582742
OpenAlexW1600856724

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.