Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12582741›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology2003

Use of the E test to assess synergy of antibiotic combinations against isolates of Burkholderia cepacia-complex from patients with cystic fibrosis.

G Manno, E Ugolotti, M L Belli, M L Fenu, L Romano, M Cruciani

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Antimicrobial susceptibility and synergy studies of cystic fibrosis sputum by direct sputum sensitivity testing.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2012
    Article
  5. Article
  6. In vitro antimicrobial synergy testing of coagulase-negative staphylococci isolated from prosthetic joint infections using Etest and with a focus on rifampicin and linezolid.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2010
    Article
  7. Evaluation of the E test for the assessment of synergy of antibiotic combinations against multiresistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from cystic fibrosis patients.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2006
    Article
  8. Evaluation of antibiotic combinations against multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii using the E-test.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2005
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

G MannoDepartment of Paediatrics, Infectious Diseases Research and Diagnosis Laboratory, Gaslini Research Institute-Children's Hospital, University of Genoa, Largo G. Gaslini 5, 16147 Genoa, Italy. graziana@unige.it
E Ugolotti
M L Belli
M L Fenu
L Romano
M Cruciani
University of Genoa · ITIstituto Giannina Gaslini · ITUniversity of Verona · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Treatment of Burkholderia cepacia-complex infections in cystic fibrosis patients is problematic, since the microorganism is often resistant to most antimicrobial agents. In this study, the Epsilometer test, or E test, was used to assess the activity of antimicrobial combinations against Burkholderia cepacia-complex. In a preliminary evaluation, the E test was compared to the checkerboard method using 10 test organisms. Synergy testing by the E test was then performed on 131 clinical isolates of Burkholderia cepacia-complex using various combinations of antimicrobial agents. Agreement between the E test and the checkerboard method was 90%. The rate of resistance to individual agents ranged from 48% for meropenem to 100% for tobramycin, chloramphenicol, and rifampin. In 71.6%, 15.6%, and 12.6% of the test evaluations performed, the combinations tested resulted in additivity/indifference, synergism, and antagonism, respectively. The highest rates of synergy were observed with combinations of ciprofloxacin-piperacillin (44%), rifampin-ceftazidime (33%), chloramphenicol-ceftazidime (22%), cotrimoxazole-piperacillin/tazobactam (22%), and ciprofloxacin-ceftazidime (21%). Rates of antagonism for cotrimoxazole and chloramphenicol in combination with beta-lactam agents were higher than those observed for ciprofloxacin plus beta-lactam agents. These results suggest that the E test is a valuable and practical method to be considered for improving the identification of possible therapeutic options in cystic fibrosis patients infected with organisms belonging to the Burkholderia cepacia-complex.

Indexed as

Bacteriological TechniquesBurkholderia cepaciaBurkholderia InfectionsCeftazidimeChildChild, PreschoolChi-Square DistributionCiprofloxacinCystic FibrosisDrug Resistance, MicrobialDrug SynergismDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleHumansLactamsMaleCeftazidimeCiprofloxacinLactamsPiperacillinRifampin

Identifiers

PMID12582741
OpenAlexW2123686675

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.